Probing Defects in Covalent Organic Frameworks.
Saba Daliran1, Ali Reza Oveisi2, Amarajothi Dhakshinamoorthy3,4
1Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Lorestan University, Khorramabad 68151-44316, Iran.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|September 16, 2024
Summary
Defects in covalent organic frameworks (COFs) critically impact material properties. This review details advanced techniques for characterizing and quantifying these defects, essential for COF performance optimization.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Chemistry
Background:
- Defects in covalent organic frameworks (COFs) significantly influence their properties, including adsorbate interactions, charge transport, and light absorption.
- Understanding and controlling these defects are crucial for tailoring COF performance in various applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive review of techniques for characterizing and quantifying defects in COFs.
- To analyze the strengths and limitations of each method for different defect types.
Main Methods:
- The review examines a wide range of characterization techniques.
- These include powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), spectroscopy (IR, NMR, XPS), microscopy (SEM, STEM, STM, HRTEM), thermal analysis (TGA), gas adsorption, titration, and computational methods.
Main Results:
- Two primary defect types are identified: missing organic moieties and structural imperfections.
- Each technique's ability to provide qualitative and quantitative defect information is critically assessed.
- The complementary nature and synergistic potential of various techniques are highlighted.
Conclusions:
- Accurate characterization of COF defects is vital for advancing materials science.
- Future research should focus on overcoming existing challenges in defect analysis and developing novel characterization strategies.
Keywords:
Covalent Organic FrameworksDefect characterizationDefect engineeringDisordersImperfectionsMissing-linker structuresModulated synthesisTruncation strategyMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Network Covalent Solids
13.4K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
13.4K
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
26.2K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
26.2K
Covalent Bonds
7.3K
Overview
When two atoms share electrons to complete their valence shells, they create a covalent bond. An atom's electronegativity—the force with which shared electrons are pulled towards an atom—determines how the electrons are shared. Molecules formed with covalent bonds can be either polar or nonpolar. Atoms with similar electronegativities form nonpolar covalent bonds; the electrons are shared equally. Atoms with different electronegativities share electrons unequally,...
When two atoms share electrons to complete their valence shells, they create a covalent bond. An atom's electronegativity—the force with which shared electrons are pulled towards an atom—determines how the electrons are shared. Molecules formed with covalent bonds can be either polar or nonpolar. Atoms with similar electronegativities form nonpolar covalent bonds; the electrons are shared equally. Atoms with different electronegativities share electrons unequally,...
7.3K
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
10.3K
The molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in a manner similar to the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a molecular orbital. Mathematically, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) generates molecular orbitals. Combinations of in-phase atomic orbital wave functions result in regions with a high probability of electron density, while...
10.3K
Covalent Bonding and Lewis Structures
48.9K
Compared to ionic bonds, which results from the transfer of electrons between metallic and nonmetallic atoms, covalent bonds result from the mutual attraction of atoms for a “shared” pair of electrons.
48.9K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
41.7K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
41.7K


