Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

559
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
559
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

36
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
36
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

885
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
885
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Modeling in Therapy01:26

Modeling in Therapy

56
Modeling, a key technique in therapy, uses observational learning to help clients acquire and practice new skills by watching therapists demonstrate desired behaviors. This approach, rooted in Albert Bandura's concept of vicarious learning, plays a significant role in therapeutic interventions for various psychological conditions, including social anxiety, ADHD, and depression.
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
56
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimation of comparable standardized mean differences in cluster randomized trials with covariate adjustment.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Agronomic Biofortification Strategies to Increase Grain Zinc Concentrations of Wheat, Rice and Maize: A Systematic Review and Network-Meta-Analysis.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Risk of Bias in Experiments, Quasi-Experiments and Natural Experiments Across Disciplines: Discussion Paper and Assessment Framework.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Effects of Social Prescribing for Older Adults: An Evidence and Gap Map.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Protocol: Long Distance Walking and Psychosocial Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Campbell Standards: Modernizing Campbell's Methodologic Expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews

Ariel M Aloe1, Omar Dewidar2, Emily A Hennessy3

  • 1Educational Measurement and Statistics The University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.

Campbell Systematic Reviews
|October 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The Campbell Collaboration has updated its Methodological Expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) to a streamlined checklist. This new guidance simplifies conducting and reporting systematic reviews for all review types.

Keywords:
methodologyreporting guidelinessystematic review

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.4K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.4K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Systematic Review Methodology
  • Research Synthesis Standards
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • The previous Methodological Expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) were lengthy and difficult to cross-reference.
  • There was a need to adapt guidelines for new review types, including reviews of associations or risk factors.
  • Feedback indicated a desire for a more holistic and integrated checklist for both conduct and reporting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To modernize and shorten the MECCIR guidance and checklist.
  • To create a unified checklist encompassing conduct and reporting for all Campbell Collaboration review types.
  • To enhance relevance for quantitative non-intervention reviews.

Main Methods:

  • A virtual working group of Campbell members with systematic review and methods editor experience was formed.
  • Existing MECCIR items were aligned with conduct principles from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extensions and PRISMA-2020.
  • Nine meetings were held to refine the checklist and guidance, with feedback sought from Campbell editors and specialists.

Main Results:

  • A new Campbell Standards guidance document with a unified checklist has been developed.
  • The guidance comprises seven main sections and 35 distinct items.
  • The updated standards integrate conduct and reporting expectations, aligning with PRISMA guidelines for reporting.

Conclusions:

  • The updated Campbell Standards provide a more concise and holistic framework for systematic reviews.
  • Authors are recommended to use the checklist throughout the review process (protocol, conduct, reporting).
  • The standards will be a living document, updated periodically based on new evidence and community feedback.