Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

339
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
339
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

384
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
384

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Lü: Aerophilic interfaces across scales.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Aerophilic debubbling.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Non-Laplacian air-gap electrostatics for high-field oil-water nanoemulsion separation.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Cartesian equivariant representations for learning and understanding molecular orbitals.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Alternating Electrochemical Redox-Cycling on Nanocomposite Biointerface for High-Efficiency Enzyme-Free Cell Detachment.

ACS nano·2025
Same author

Bubble-driven cell detachment.

Science advances·2025
Same journal

Exploring gefitinib to enhance endocytosis of antibodies and nucleic acid aptamers targeting EGFR in glioblastoma.

Nanoscale·2026
Same journal

Wavelength-selective bipolar photoresponse in CVD-grown β-Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> flakes for multi-logic functionality.

Nanoscale·2026
Same journal

Bio-conjugated ultrabright fluorescent nanoparticles for targeted cancer-cell imaging: independent size control and brightness.

Nanoscale·2026
Same journal

Ru-anchored heterojunction catalyst: synergistic modulation of electronic structure for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction.

Nanoscale·2026
Same journal

Seed-mediated synthesis of NHC-stabilised Cu@Au core-shell nanoparticles from an NHC-Au(I) complex.

Nanoscale·2026
Same journal

Sulphur-affected microstructural evolution mechanism of WS<sub>2</sub>.

Nanoscale·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Anaerobic Protein Purification and Kinetic Analysis via Oxygen Electrode for Studying DesB Dioxygenase Activity and Inhibition
08:31

Anaerobic Protein Purification and Kinetic Analysis via Oxygen Electrode for Studying DesB Dioxygenase Activity and Inhibition

Published on: October 3, 2018

8.4K

Machine learning-guided discovery of gas evolving electrode bubble inactivation.

Jack R Lake1, Simon Rufer1, Jim James2

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. varanasi@mit.edu.

Nanoscale
|October 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Electrochemical bubbles reduce gas-evolving electrode performance. This study shows inactivation is closer to direct bubble contact area, not the entire projected area, using surface engineering and machine learning.

More Related Videos

Characterizing Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer in Lactic Acid Bacteria with a Three-Electrode, Two-Chamber Bioelectrochemical System
10:23

Characterizing Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer in Lactic Acid Bacteria with a Three-Electrode, Two-Chamber Bioelectrochemical System

Published on: August 23, 2024

705
Induction of Cerebral Arterial Gas Embolism in Rat
06:26

Induction of Cerebral Arterial Gas Embolism in Rat

Published on: October 18, 2024

385

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Anaerobic Protein Purification and Kinetic Analysis via Oxygen Electrode for Studying DesB Dioxygenase Activity and Inhibition
08:31

Anaerobic Protein Purification and Kinetic Analysis via Oxygen Electrode for Studying DesB Dioxygenase Activity and Inhibition

Published on: October 3, 2018

8.4K
Characterizing Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer in Lactic Acid Bacteria with a Three-Electrode, Two-Chamber Bioelectrochemical System
10:23

Characterizing Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer in Lactic Acid Bacteria with a Three-Electrode, Two-Chamber Bioelectrochemical System

Published on: August 23, 2024

705
Induction of Cerebral Arterial Gas Embolism in Rat
06:26

Induction of Cerebral Arterial Gas Embolism in Rat

Published on: October 18, 2024

385

Area of Science:

  • Electrochemistry
  • Surface Science
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Electrochemical bubbles adversely affect gas-evolving electrode performance.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding the extent of bubble-induced inactivation and its evolution.
  • Current models often approximate inactivation based on the entire projected electrode area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate electrode inactivation caused by oxygen evolution.
  • To analyze the impact of surface engineering on bubble formation and electrode inactivation.
  • To develop a more accurate method for estimating bubble-induced electrode inactivation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing surface engineering to control bubble formation during oxygen evolution.
  • Employing a machine learning-based, image-based bubble detection method.
  • Analyzing large quantities of experimental data to quantify bubble impacts and electrode inactivation.

Main Results:

  • Electrode inactivation is not accurately represented by the entire projected area.
  • Surface-engineered electrodes exhibit small bubble impacts, with high projected areas and low direct bubble contact.
  • A new methodology provides a more accurate estimation of bubble inactivation, correlating it with direct bubble contact area.

Conclusions:

  • The assumption of inactivation across the entire projected electrode area is a poor approximation.
  • Surface engineering strategies can mitigate inactivation by controlling bubble dynamics.
  • Accurate assessment of inactivation requires considering the directly contacted area by bubbles.