Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Construction and Systematical Symmetric Studies of a Series of Supramolecular Clusters with Binary or Ternary Ammonium Triphenylacetates
Published on: February 15, 2016
Symmetry Breaking in a Triferrous Extended Metal Atom Chain
Jefferson E Bates1, Jack N McKeon1, Gary L Guillet2
1Department of Chemistry & Fermentation Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608-2021, United States.
Abstract:
Semilocal and random phase approximation (RPA) density functional theory (DFT) and complete active space (CASSCF + NEVPT2) methodologies were applied to investigate a new class of extended metal atom chain (EMAC) complexes. A novel triferrous complex has been synthesized recently that does not utilize the usual 2,2'-dipyridylamine (dpa) ligand framework, which essentially always results in a tetragonal coordination environment and general formula M3(dpa)4X2, where X is an anion. Instead, the triferrous complex utilizes a dianionic, 2,6-bis(trimethylsilylamido)pyridine ligand (L2-) resulting in the formation of trigonal complexes with general formula FeL. To better understand the electronic structure of this complex, calculations were utilized to explore the experimentally isolated FeL, and a smaller theoretical complex, in order to compare and contrast with the traditional dpa-based EMACs. Due to the absence of anionic, axial ligands, the sigma nonbonding orbitals formed from the metal d orbitals are lower in energy than in the dpa complexes, and compete with the pi bonding orbitals for occupation in the FeL complex. While the idealized geometry of these complexes is D3, a helical distortion of the ligands and subsequent electronic symmetry breaking due to Jahn-Teller distortions are predicted utilizing both semilocal and RPA DFT methods, ending in a C2 structure that closely matches the reported crystal structure. Predicted Mössbauer isomer shifts and ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) spectra also agree with the experimental data available in the literature. Magnetic coupling constants also indicate ferromagnetic coupling between nearest neighbor irons. Two-dimensional (2D) potential energy surfaces were calculated for a range of fixed Fe-Fe bond lengths, revealing a flat potential energy surface over a wide range of Fe-Fe bond lengths and verifying the ability of RPA to act as a higher-level check on semilocal DFT results. In order to verify the predicted high-spin ground state, CASSCF + NEVPT2 was applied to selected molecular configurations and confirmed the predictions made by DFT. These calculations shed light on the physical ground state electron configuration of FeL and correlate this electronic configuration with the available experimental data.
More Related Videos
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
08:15Synthesis of Nine-atom Deltahedral Zintl Ions of Germanium and their Functionalization with Organic Groups
Published on: February 11, 2012
Related Concept Videos
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Exceptions to the Octet Rule
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...