Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
6.9K
Harnessing Available Evidence in Single-Case Experimental Studies: The Use of Multilevel Meta-Analysis.
Wim Van den Noortgate1,2, Patrick Onghena1
1Methodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Psychologica Belgica
|October 28, 2024
Summary
Multilevel models offer a robust method for analyzing single-case experimental design (SCED) studies. This approach effectively handles complexities like autocorrelation and time trends in SCED research.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Science
- Research Methodology
- Statistics
Background:
- Multilevel models have been used for meta-analyses of single-case experimental design (SCED) studies for approximately 20 years.
- The application of these models has grown, with increasing complexity and empirical evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a state-of-the-art overview of multilevel models for SCED research.
- To summarize simulation findings and discuss ongoing challenges in the field.
Main Methods:
- Review of basic and advanced multilevel models for SCED data.
- Summary of empirical evaluations of multilevel approaches.
- Discussion of methods to address SCED complexities.
Main Results:
- Multilevel models can effectively integrate and compare results from multiple SCED studies.
- These models can accommodate various complexities inherent in SCED data, including autocorrelation, time trends, and heterogeneity.
- Extensive research has validated the utility of multilevel models in diverse SCED research scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Multilevel modeling is a sophisticated and increasingly utilized approach for synthesizing SCED research.
- The flexibility of these models allows for the analysis of complex SCED data structures.
- Further research is needed to address remaining issues in the application of multilevel models to SCED.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Crossover Experiments
2.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.7K
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K

