Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Quality Control Circle Practices to Reduce Specimen Rejection Rates
Bijun Li1, Xinjian Cai1, Lili Zhan1
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Quality assurance in laboratory testing significantly impacts patient care. The pre-analytical phase is particularly error-prone, contributing to around 70% of laboratory errors. High specimen rejection rates can delay diagnosis and treatment, cause patient discomfort, and increase healthcare costs. Quality Control Circles (QCC) have been introduced to medical institutions to improve process efficiency and reduce errors. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QCC practices in reducing specimen rejection rates in a hospital clinical laboratory.
Methods:
A QCC initiative was implemented in the clinical laboratory from July 2021 to August 2022. The QCC comprised members from the clinical laboratory, nursing department, and administration. The initiative followed the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and involved multiple quality control methods, including flowchart analysis, Pareto analysis, and Fishbone diagrams. The effectiveness of the initiative was evaluated using statistical analyses of specimen rejection rates before and after implementation.
Results:
The QCC initiative led to a significant reduction in specimen rejection rates. The monthly specimen rejection rate decreased from an average of 1.13% before the intervention to 0.27% after the intervention. The most significant factors contributing to specimen rejection were identified as lack of sample collection information and blood clotting. Targeted interventions, such as appointing specimen collection liaisons, establishing a quality control team, and providing training on blood collection procedures, were implemented. These measures resulted in a notable decrease in the proportion of rejected specimens due to the identified factors.
Conclusion:
The implementation of QCC practices effectively reduced specimen rejection rates in the hospital laboratory. The study highlights the importance of systematic quality control methods and targeted interventions in improving laboratory processes. The success of the QCC initiative demonstrates its potential for broader application in other healthcare settings to enhance quality and efficiency.
Insights
Quality Control Circles (QCC) significantly reduced specimen rejection rates in a hospital laboratory. This quality assurance initiative improved pre-analytical phase efficiency, enhancing patient care and reducing healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Medical Laboratory Science
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- The pre-analytical phase of laboratory testing is a major source of errors (approx. 70%), impacting patient care.
- High specimen rejection rates lead to diagnostic delays, increased costs, and patient discomfort.
- Quality Control Circles (QCC) are utilized in healthcare to enhance process efficiency and minimize errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of Quality Control Circles (QCC) in reducing specimen rejection rates within a hospital clinical laboratory.
- To identify key factors contributing to specimen rejection and implement targeted interventions.
Main Methods:
- A Quality Control Circle (QCC) initiative was implemented from July 2021 to August 2022.
- The initiative utilized the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and quality control tools like flowchart, Pareto, and Fishbone analyses.
- Specimen rejection rates were statistically analyzed pre- and post-intervention.
Main Results:
- A significant reduction in monthly specimen rejection rates was observed, decreasing from 1.13% to 0.27%.
- Key rejection factors identified were insufficient sample collection information and blood clotting.
- Targeted interventions, including liaisons, a quality control team, and enhanced training, were implemented.
Conclusions:
- Quality Control Circle (QCC) practices effectively decreased specimen rejection rates in the clinical laboratory setting.
- Systematic quality control and targeted interventions are crucial for optimizing laboratory processes.
- The QCC model shows promise for improving quality and efficiency in broader healthcare applications.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Sample Handling
Samples should be transported carefully from collection points to the laboratory. They should be properly sealed and clearly labeled to prevent cross-contamination. To preserve the sample integrity, optimal temperature conditions during transport are essential. This could involve using...

