Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

09:08
Measuring Material Microstructure Under Flow Using 1-2 Plane Flow-Small Angle Neutron Scattering
Published on: February 6, 2014
14.3K
Comparison of line width calibration using critical dimension atomic force microscopes between PTB and NIST
Gaoliang Dai1, Kai Hahm1, Harald Bosse1
1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, PTB, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.
Measurement Science & Technology
|October 31, 2024
Summary
National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) in Germany and the US compared line width calibration using Critical Dimension Atomic Force Microscopy (CD-AFM). Results showed excellent agreement, confirming measurement accuracy for critical dimensions (CDs) down to 50 nm.
Area of Science:
- Metrology and Measurement Science
- Materials Science and Engineering
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- International comparisons between National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) are crucial for validating measurement results and uncertainties.
- Accurate calibration of line width standards is essential for semiconductor manufacturing and nanotechnology applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the line width calibration of a crystalline silicon line width standard (IVPS100-PTB) between the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
- To verify the consistency and accuracy of measurement results obtained through independently developed traceability pathways.
Main Methods:
- Critical Dimension Atomic Force Microscopy (CD-AFM) was employed as the primary measurement technique.
- Traceability pathways involved calibrating the atomic force microscope (AFM) scanner using step height and lateral standards.
- Effective tip width was traced to the silicon lattice parameter via High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM).
Main Results:
- Good agreement was achieved between PTB and NIST for line feature critical dimensions (CDs) ranging from 50 nm to 130 nm.
- Observed deviations in CD results were between -1.5 nm and 0.3 nm.
- These deviations were well within the calculated measurement uncertainties, indicating high measurement agreement.
Conclusions:
- The comparison successfully validated the line width calibration capabilities of both PTB and NIST.
- The independently developed traceability pathways demonstrated robustness and reliability.
- The results support the confidence in metrological measurements for critical dimensions in advanced manufacturing.

