Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Position and Displacement01:31

Position and Displacement

17.4K
The position of an object defines its location relative to a convenient frame of reference at any particular time. A frame of reference is an arbitrary set of axes from which the position and motion of an object are described. Earth is often used as a frame of reference, and we often describe the position of an object as it relates to stationary objects on Earth. For example, a rocket launch could be described in terms of the position of the rocket with respect to Earth as a whole. On the other...
17.4K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

599
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
599
Position and Displacement Vectors01:00

Position and Displacement Vectors

9.4K
To describe the motion of an object, one should first be able to describe its position (where it is at any particular time). More precisely, the position needs to be specified relative to a convenient frame of reference. A frame of reference is an arbitrary set of axes from which the position and motion of an object are described. Earth is often used as a frame of reference to describe the position of an object in relation to stationary objects on Earth.
Further, several important kinds of...
9.4K
Curvilinear Motion: Polar Coordinates01:27

Curvilinear Motion: Polar Coordinates

347
In polar coordinates, the motion of a particle follows a curvilinear path. The radial coordinate symbolized as 'r,' extends outward from a fixed origin to the particle, while the angular coordinate, 'θ,' measured in radians, represents the counterclockwise angle between a fixed reference line and the radial line connecting the origin to the particle.
The particle's location is described using a unit vector along the radial direction. Deriving the particle's position...
347
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method01:34

Velocity and Position by Graphical Method

7.3K
Velocity and position can be calculated from the known function of acceleration as a function of time. The total area under the acceleration-time graph and the velocity-time graph gives the change in velocity and position, respectively. In the case of an airplane, its acceleration is tracked using the inertial navigation system. The pilot provides the input of the airplane's initial position and velocity before takeoff. The inertial navigation system then uses the acceleration data to...
7.3K
Vector Components in the Cartesian Coordinate System01:29

Vector Components in the Cartesian Coordinate System

19.1K
Vectors are usually described in terms of their components in a coordinate system. Even in everyday life, we naturally invoke the concept of orthogonal projections in a rectangular coordinate system. For example, if someone gives you directions for a particular location, you will be told to go a few km in a direction like east, west, north, or south, along with the angle in which you are supposed to move. In a rectangular (Cartesian) xy-coordinate system in a plane, a point in a plane is...
19.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual Search Within a Limited Window Area: Scrolling Versus Moving Window.

i-Perception·2020
Same journal

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Predictive visual uncertainty around moving trajectories influences causality judgments in launching displays.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Sensorimotor numerosity uniquely supports arithmetic development in children.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

In praise of anaglyphs.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Is number a primary perceptual attribute?

i-Perception·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Encoding of object location in a scrolling display.

Yumiko Fujii1,2, Hiromi Morita1

  • 1Institute of Library, Information and Media Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

I-Perception
|November 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scrolling and moving-window image viewing on small screens do not affect object location recall accuracy but increase observation time. Sequential viewing and image manipulation may degrade encoding efficiency.

Keywords:
object encodingobject locationscrolling displaysequential viewvisual information processingvisual working memory

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

891
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K
Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

891
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Small screens necessitate unique visual information processing strategies like scrolling and windowing.
  • Understanding how these viewing methods impact spatial memory encoding is crucial for interface design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of scrolling and moving-window viewing conditions on the encoding of object location compared to a full-view condition.
  • To determine if sequential viewing or image manipulation influences spatial memory accuracy and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed an image with 10 objects under three conditions: scrolling, moving-window, and no-window (full view).
  • Following observation, participants recalled the location of target objects without time constraints.

Main Results:

  • Object location recall accuracy was comparable across all three viewing conditions.
  • Observation time significantly increased in the order of scrolling, moving-window, and no-window conditions.

Conclusions:

  • While scrolling and moving-window views maintain object location recall accuracy, they require more observation time.
  • Sequential image viewing and manipulation, characteristic of small-screen interactions, may lead to less efficient spatial encoding.