Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Reclassifying cT4b buccal mucosa/gingivobuccal complex cancers: do we need to change?
Rakesh Katna1, Aastha Maini2, Parth Patni2
1Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Pedder Road, Mumbai, India; Bombay Hospital and Research Centre, Marine Lines, Mumbai, India; Vedant Hospital, Thane, India.
Surgery for very locally advanced oral cancers (cT4b) is feasible. This study shows acceptable oncological outcomes, including survival rates, for patients undergoing surgical resection, even with extensive tumor involvement.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Head and Neck Cancer
Background:
- T4b oral cavity carcinomas are locally advanced, often considered borderline resectable or unresectable.
- The role of surgical intervention for these advanced tumors remains incompletely defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of surgical resection for clinically staged T4b oral cavity carcinomas.
- To identify prognostic factors influencing survival in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 218 patients with cT4b oral cancer treated between 2013 and 2021.
- Patients underwent composite resection, with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and selective infratemporal fossa (ITF) clearance for advanced disease.
- Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The median follow-up was 54 months, with 5-year survival rates of 54% (locoregional control), 52% (disease-free survival), and 59% (overall survival).
- Multivariate analysis identified nodal disease, perineural invasion, and bone involvement as significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival.
- Surgery was feasible, with acceptable outcomes despite advanced disease stage.
Conclusions:
- Surgical resection for cT4b oral cavity cancer is a viable treatment option.
- Careful patient selection and surgical technique, including potential ITF clearance, can lead to acceptable oncological results.
- Nodal status, perineural invasion, and bone involvement are critical prognostic indicators for survival.
More Related Videos
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
14:14Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
Published on: February 28, 2014