Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Dosimetric evaluation and Monte Carlo simulation of a new proposed surface brachytherapy mould
Fatemeh Salamat1, Zahra Siavashpour2, Mahdi Sadeghi1
1Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medicine Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to develop a new in-house low-cost surface mould, and to evaluate its performance and dosimetric properties for high-dose-rate (HDR) cobalt-60 (60Co) brachytherapy.
Material And Methods:
A water-equivalent surface mould was developed using medical silicone. Mould performance and dosimetry characteristics were evaluated with Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP2.6) simulation, Gafchromic™ EBT3 film measurements, and treatment planning system (TPS) output. Three sample moulds with different thicknesses (i.e., 0.5 cm, 1 cm, and 1.5 cm) were constructed, and a phantom study was performed. Treatment plans prescribing 3 Gy to 0.5 cm under pseudo-skin were designed, and film dosimetry was completed. TPS dose distributions were compared using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and film dosimetry.
Results:
Good consistency was observed between TPS results and film dosimetry at the prescribed depth of 0.5 cm, with mean differences of 0.70%, 0.40%, and 0.19% for mould thicknesses of 0.5 cm, 1 cm, and 1.5 cm, respectively. However, higher discrepancies were found at the phantom surface with 1.00%, 0.80%, and 0.56% dose differences for the considered mould thicknesses, respectively. These increased differences could be due to a higher dose gradient at the phantom surface, and a greater impact of uncertainties on the obtained results in this part. Moreover, mean differences between the results obtained from MC simulations and output of TPS at the prescribed depth of 0.5 cm were 0.73%, 0.60%, and 0.08% for mold thicknesses of 0.5 cm, 1 cm, and 1.5 cm, respectively. Higher variations were observed between TPS and MC at the phantom surface with 1.30%, 0.70%, and 0.13% dose differences for the considered mould thicknesses, respectively.
Conclusions:
The developed surface mould demonstrated water equivalence at 60Co energies, and was consistent with TPS calculations at routine treatment depths. Its effectiveness in non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) lesion treatment is highlighted. However, due to mould attenuation, TG-43-based TPS overestimated the dose delivered using this mould, especially at pseudo-skin surface, emphasizing the necessity for a model-based TPS algorithm.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model