Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment RMCA in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: July 19, 2013
Evaluation of disaster safe education unit programme implementation in Mt. Merapi using the pressure state response
Puspita I Wardhani1, Muhammad Musiyam1, Yunus A Wibowo1
1Department of Geography Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Indonesia.
The Disaster Safe Education Unit (SPAB) program shows low implementation rates in Indonesian schools, with significant gaps in its three pillars due to regulatory, funding, and resource issues. Strengthening regulations is crucial for improving school resilience.
Area of Science:
- Disaster Risk Reduction
- Educational Management
- Public Health
Background:
- The Disaster Safe Education Unit (SPAB), globally known as Comprehensive Safe School (CSS), aims to enhance school resilience.
- Despite established frameworks, SPAB implementation has yielded unsatisfactory results in disaster-prone areas.
- This study addresses the need to evaluate SPAB effectiveness in a high-risk volcanic region.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation status of the SPAB program in schools located in the Merapi Vulcano disaster-prone area (KRB).
- To identify factors hindering the successful implementation of the three SPAB pillars.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for improving SPAB program efficacy.
Main Methods:
- A field survey and in-depth interviews were conducted with 32 schools in the KRB Merapi.
- The Pressure-State-Response (PSR) indicator was utilized to assess SPAB implementation.
- Data analysis focused on the extent of adoption of the three SPAB pillars.
Main Results:
- Not all schools in the KRB Merapi have fully implemented the SPAB program.
- Pillar 3 showed the highest implementation rate (96.40%), while Pillar 1 had the lowest (54.5%).
- Key barriers identified include inadequate legality, funding, and human resources, impacting infrastructure, educator capacity, and school motivation.
Conclusions:
- The current implementation of SPAB pillars is incomplete, necessitating regulatory strengthening.
- Enhanced regulations can facilitate increased funding, capacity building, infrastructure improvement, and motivation for SPAB implementation.
- Findings offer insights for developing more effective SPAB regulatory frameworks in similar disaster-prone zones.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Concept of Pressure at a Point
In a fluid at rest, pressure acts equally in...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

