Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
A novel tool to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer based on clinical and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
Snir Dekalo1, Jonathan Kuten2, Tomer Bashi1
1Department of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Introduction:
We sought to develop a model that predicts lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer incorporating preoperative clinical and 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) parameters.
Methods:
A cohort of 413 consecutive patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to radical prostatectomy from 2015-2020 was used to develop and validate the model. The cohort was split into a learning (70%) and a validation group (30%). The former was used to identify clinical and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT parameters (number and diameter of PET-positive lymph nodes) for prediction of pathologic LNI by applying multivariable logistic regression analyses. The discrimination ability of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and internal validation was performed using the validation cohort.
Results:
One-hundred sixty-three men (39%) were categorized as high-risk, 168 (41%) as unfavorable-intermediate-risk, and 82 (20%) as favorable-intermediate-risk. Thirty-one patients (7.5%) had LNI on final pathology. All underwent extended lymph node dissection. Clinical stage, the presence of PET-positive lymph nodes, and diameter of the largest PET-positive node were included in the final predictive model. Four different categories were defined for estimating the risk for LNI. Internal validation was completed after applying the four-tire classification on both the learning and validation groups and achieving similar results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the model were 97%, 54%, 15%, and 99%, respectively, and area under the ROC curve was 0.906 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.95, p<0.001). Using a 5% cutoff as a threshold for performing lymph node dissection, only one patient with LNI on final pathology would have been classified erroneously as node negative, while 206 (50%) men would have been spared an unwarranted lymph node dissection.
Conclusions:
We present a novel prediction model for LNI that incorporates clinical staging and molecular imaging data. Pending further validation, this model may improve the risk stratification and patient selection for lymph node dissection at time of radical prostatectomy.
