Novel Method for Measuring Ambient Heat Exposure-Acute Healthcare Utilization Associations Within a Safety Net: A
Elizabeth Gillespie1,2, Abigail Steiner3, Josh Durfee3
1Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. Elizabeth.Gillespie@dhha.org.
Background:
Extreme and inequitable heat exposures cause weather-related deaths. Associations between maximum daily temperature and individual-level healthcare utilization have been inadequately characterized.
Objective:
To evaluate and compare demographic and clinical associations for an individual's healthcare utilization between high- and low-temperature periods.
Design:
Retrospective, 5-year longitudinal study of acute care utilization comparing high-temperature periods (HHP) and low-temperature periods (LHP) defined by local maximum daily temperature. Using duration of observation, cases served as their own controls. Temperature-dependent utilization was reported as unadjusted incident rate ratio (IRR) using Poisson regression and log-transformed variable coefficients. IRRs were adjusted (aIRR) for demographic characteristics, heat-sensitive conditions/diagnoses, and neighborhood heat vulnerability score; false discovery rate p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Subjects:
Patients aged ≥ 4 years visiting Denver Health between 4/10/2016 and 12/31/2020, with ≥ 2 visits over ≥ 365 days.
Main Measures:
Comparison of an individual's acute care visit rates in HHP versus LHP, stratified by demographic characteristics and heat-sensitive clinical conditions.
Key Results:
While acute care utilization occurred at similar or higher rates during LHP compared with HHP, certain groups (i.e., Native Americans and those with congestive heart failure, liver failure, and/or alcohol use) had higher rates of utilization during HHP. Significant associations existed for acute care utilization by age, sex, racial and ethnic groupings, clinical characteristics, and neighborhood heat vulnerability. Adjusting for demographic and environmental covariates, individuals with any heat-sensitive clinical condition had higher HHP vs LHP utilization compared to those without (aIRR = 1.93).
Conclusions:
Significant heat-related utilization occurred among individuals with heat-sensitive clinical conditions compared with those without. Demographic characteristics (e.g., older) and specific clinical conditions (e.g., liver failure) demonstrated higher utilization. In real-time, chronic disease management programs could proactively identify at-risk individuals for interventions which reduce heat-related morbidity and healthcare utilization.
More Related Videos
15:00Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:14Temperature Measurement Sites
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
01:11Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
01:19Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's...
01:14Assessing Body Temperature - Oral
Step 1:
Start by practicing proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of microorganisms.
Step 2:
Take the thermometer out of the charging unit, switch it on, and wait for the ready sign.
Step 3:
Gently slide the probe cover until a click is heard. This simple action prevents cross-contamination and ensures the correct placement of the probe cover.
Step 4:
Instruct the patient to open their mouth and place...
02:20Longitudinal Research
01:14Assessing Body Temperature - Axilla
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and put on clean gloves to maintain infection control and prevent cross-contamination.
Step 2: Prepare the patient by explaining the procedure to ensure understanding and cooperation. Ensure privacy, expose the axilla, and inform the patient that minimal movement is crucial for an accurate reading.
Step 3: Adjust the patient’s clothing to expose only the axilla. It minimizes...