Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

470
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
470
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

425
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
425
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

373
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
373
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

334
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
334
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis01:21

Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis

714
Mass spectrometry is an important technique for the identification of pure compounds. However, it has some limitations for the analysis of complex mixtures, often due to excessive fragmentation making the spectrum too complicated to decipher. Mass spectrometry can be combined with suitable separation methods in sequence, forming hyphenated methods, which are useful in the analysis of complex mixtures.
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
714

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smart detection of juice adulteration: An approach based on ion mobility spectrometry and machine learning.

Journal of the science of food and agriculture·2026
Same author

Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Anthocyanins from Torch Ginger.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Nanoemulsion design of Cynara cardunculus leaves extract rich in sesquiterpene lactones.

Pest management science·2026
Same author

Phytochemical, Ethnobotanical, Pharmacological, and Toxicological Profile of <i>Globularia alypum</i> L.: A Comprehensive Review.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Determining Moisture Content in Milk Powder: Challenges in the Evaluation of Performance by Proficiency Testing Using Independent Reference Values.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Quantification of Minerals in Edible Mushrooms via Optimized Microwave-Assisted Digestion: Nutritional Contributions of Fe, Mg, Na, K, and Ca.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

GC-based Detection of Aldononitrile Acetate Derivatized Glucosamine and Muramic Acid for Microbial Residue Determination in Soil
11:06

GC-based Detection of Aldononitrile Acetate Derivatized Glucosamine and Muramic Acid for Microbial Residue Determination in Soil

Published on: May 19, 2012

16.9K

Detecting Honey Adulteration: Advanced Approach Using UF-GC Coupled with Machine Learning.

Irene Punta-Sánchez1, Tomasz Dymerski2, José Luis P Calle1

  • 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Cadiz, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), IVAGRO, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Detecting honey adulteration is now more reliable using ultra-fast gas chromatography (UF-GC) combined with machine learning (ML). This novel approach accurately identifies adulterants in honey, ensuring food authenticity.

Keywords:
adulterationclassificationfood controlhoneymachine learningregressionultra-fast gas chromatographyvolatile compounds

More Related Videos

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
07:29

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis

Published on: November 11, 2022

1.9K
Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements
10:25

Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements

Published on: June 28, 2016

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

GC-based Detection of Aldononitrile Acetate Derivatized Glucosamine and Muramic Acid for Microbial Residue Determination in Soil
11:06

GC-based Detection of Aldononitrile Acetate Derivatized Glucosamine and Muramic Acid for Microbial Residue Determination in Soil

Published on: May 19, 2012

16.9K
HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
07:29

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis

Published on: November 11, 2022

1.9K
Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements
10:25

Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements

Published on: June 28, 2016

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Food Chemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Honey adulteration poses a significant threat to consumer trust and market integrity.
  • Existing detection methods can be time-consuming, costly, or lack comprehensive accuracy.
  • The need for rapid, reliable, and cost-effective analytical techniques for food authenticity is paramount.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel method for detecting honey adulteration.
  • To integrate ultra-fast gas chromatography (UF-GC) with machine learning (ML) for enhanced analytical performance.
  • To assess the efficacy of Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models in predicting honey adulteration.

Main Methods:

  • Ultra-fast gas chromatography (UF-GC) was employed for rapid sample analysis.
  • Machine learning models, specifically SVR and LASSO, were trained and applied to GC data.
  • Models were evaluated for their predictive accuracy in detecting adulteration in orange blossom (OB) and sunflower (SF) honeys.

Main Results:

  • The SVR model demonstrated high predictive power (R² > 0.90) for combined honey types.
  • Treating OB and SF honeys individually significantly improved accuracy, with R² values exceeding 0.99.
  • The LASSO model showed particular effectiveness when applied to individual honey types.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of UF-GC and ML provides a robust and reliable method for honey adulteration detection.
  • This approach offers a significant advancement over traditional methods, ensuring honey authenticity.
  • The methodology holds potential for application in authenticating other food products, advancing food safety standards.