Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

09:46
Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
Published on: July 8, 2021
3.6K
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects
Andreas Koutroulis1, Vasileios Kapralos2, Dag Ørstavik1
1Section of Endodontics, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
|December 19, 2024
Summary
Root filling materials aim to prevent apical periodontitis by inhibiting bacterial invasion. Hydraulic calcium silicate cements show promise, but other materials like zinc oxide eugenol cements offer comparable clinical success, leaving their overall significance unclear.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Surgery
Background:
- Root filling materials are crucial for preventing post-endodontic apical periodontitis.
- Effective materials require excellent sealing and/or antibacterial properties to prevent bacterial invasion.
- Root-end filling and perforation repair involve challenging clinical environments with significant periradicular tissue interface.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review widely used endodontic surgery materials.
- To focus on the biological characteristics of these materials, including antibacterial properties and host cell interactions.
- To present clinical studies on amalgam, glass ionomer cements (GICs), resin systems, zinc oxide eugenol-based cements, and hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs).
Main Methods:
- Literature review of endodontic surgery materials.
- Analysis of biological properties: antibacterial effects and host tissue cell interactions.
- Evaluation of clinical studies on material performance.
Main Results:
- Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) appear to offer biological advantages, with recent formulations addressing prior issues.
- Zinc oxide eugenol-based cements are still used and demonstrate similar clinical success rates to HCSCs.
- The comparative significance of different root filling materials on long-term clinical outcomes requires further clarification.
Conclusions:
- While HCSCs present biological benefits for endodontic surgery, established materials like zinc oxide eugenol cements maintain clinical relevance.
- The choice of material for root-end filling and perforation repair warrants careful consideration of biological properties and clinical efficacy.
- Further research is needed to definitively establish the long-term clinical impact of various root filling materials.

