Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025
An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
Nail-plate combination constructs versus single traditional constructs for distal femur fractures: a systematic
Anthony N Baumann1, Mathias A Uhler2, Jay Fiechter3,4
1College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Objectives:
Distal femur fractures (DFF) are frequently treated surgically with single traditional constructs (STC), such as with a lateral plate or intramedullary nail, although nail-plate combination constructs (NPCC) are gaining attention. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between NPCC and STC for surgical fixation of DFF to guide surgeon decision-making.
Methods:
Data Sources: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus from database inception until January 10th, 2024.
Study Selection:
Inclusion criteria were comparative studies that examined clinical outcomes and complications for NPCC versus STC for DFF in adult patients.
Data Extraction:
Data included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), as well as likelihood of total complications, total unplanned reoperations, and malunion.
Data Synthesis:
Statistical analysis included a random-effects model using unstandardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR).
Results:
Five retrospective comparative studies (n = 1,368 patients; mean age: 52.3 ± 8.1 years; 134 patients in the NPCC group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.696), EBL (p = 0.408), or LOS (p = 0.963) between patients in the NPCC group as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. Patients in the NPCC group had a statistically significant lower number of total complications (p = 0.009; OR: 0.31; 10.6% versus 16.0%) and total unplanned reoperations (p = 0.027; OR: 0.42; 8.2% versus 14.8%) as compared to patients in the STC group after DFF. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of malunion cases between groups (p = 0.130), although the NPCC group had far fewer cases than the STC group (2.9% versus 10.5%).
Conclusion:
Patients treated with NPCC had significantly fewer cases of total complications and total unplanned reoperations without significant differences in operative time, EBL, or LOS as compared to patients treated with STC for DFF, although these associations are limited by sample size.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV.
