Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Decision-making for childhood vaccination in crisis settings: a survey of practice & barriers
Page M Light1, Neha S Singh2, Mervat Alhaffar1,3
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, International Health London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Insights
Improving childhood vaccination in humanitarian crises requires better access to the WHO Framework and addressing security barriers. Enhancing vaccine procurement policies is crucial for reaching zero-dose children.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Vaccinology
- Humanitarian Aid
Background:
- Children in humanitarian crises are highly vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases.
- Understanding decision-making for vaccine interventions in these settings is critical.
- This study examines vaccination practices for children in global humanitarian crises.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate decision-making processes in childhood vaccination programs within humanitarian crises.
- To identify factors influencing vaccine intervention design and delivery.
- To assess the use of the WHO decision-making framework and strategies for reaching zero-dose children.
Main Methods:
- An online survey was administered to individuals involved in childhood vaccination programs in humanitarian crisis settings.
- Respondents provided information on intervention design, vaccine delivery, and use of technical guidance.
- The survey specifically queried practices related to reaching zero-dose children.
Main Results:
- Technical guidance is highly valued, but the WHO Framework lacks accessibility (language, distribution).
- Security and resource availability are significant barriers to vaccine delivery and reaching zero-dose children.
- Vaccine access issues stem from procurement systems, not cost, and policy clarification is needed for expanded age groups.
Conclusions:
- Enhance the WHO Framework's accessibility and engage local/national actors for improved practicality and awareness.
- Address procurement system limitations to allow expanded age group vaccination for zero-dose children.
- Prioritize maintaining safe operational space and improving conflict resolution to overcome security barriers in vaccine delivery.
Background:
Children, particularly those who have received no routine vaccinations (zero-dose children), are at high risk of vaccine-preventable diseases in humanitarian crisis settings. However, the decision-making processes underlying vaccine intervention design and delivery in such settings are poorly understood. The present study investigated the decision-making practices of organisations involved in childhood vaccination in humanitarian crisis settings globally via an online survey.
Methods:
Individuals involved in the design or delivery of childhood vaccination programmes in humanitarian crisis settings were invited to fill out a self-administered online survey. Respondents were asked about factors influencing intervention design and vaccine delivery; use of technical guidance, specifically the WHO decision-making framework for vaccination in acute humanitarian emergencies (WHO Framework); and practices for reaching zero-dose children.
Results:
Fourteen responses were received. Large international organisations and UN agencies were overrepresented in the sample. Technical guidance was considered of high importance when designing vaccine interventions. However, the WHO Framework is not available in relevant languages and has not been well-distributed to local and national actors. Awareness of initiatives to reach zero-dose children was high within our sample, though this may not accurately reflect global awareness. Security and resource availability were key barriers to vaccine delivery and reaching zero-dose children. Problems with vaccine access in our sample pertained primarily to issues with the procurement system rather than vaccine cost.
Conclusions:
The WHO Framework should be provided in more languages, and vaccination actors at local and national level should be engaged to improve its practicality and increase awareness of its aims. In order to reach zero-dose children, vaccines must be made available for use in expanded age groups, which is sometimes not currently feasible within the Gavi/UNICEF procurement system. Clarifying this policy would allow relevant organisations to reach more zero-dose children. Additionally, security is a key barrier impeding vaccine delivery, including for zero-dose children. Safe operational space for humanitarian actors in conflict must be maintained and global conflict resolution mechanisms improved.
More Related Videos
09:37Detection of Polyfunctional T Cells in Children Vaccinated with Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine via the Flow Cytometry Technique
Published on: September 23, 2022
06:22Standardization of Transfer across Labs between Flow Cytometers for Detection of Lymphocytes in Japanese Encephalitis Vaccinated Children
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Vaccinations
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Steps in Outbreak Investigation