Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Impact on Distance and Near Contrast Sensitivity of Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Systematic Review
Kevin J Mena-Guevara1, Dolores de Fez, David P Piñero
1Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy (K.J.M.-G., D.F., D.P.P.), University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain; and Advanced Clinic Optometry Unit (D.P.P.), Department of Ophthalmology, Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
Limited evidence suggests multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) may variably impact contrast sensitivity (CS) in presbyopia correction. Further research is needed to confirm clinical benefits and optimize MFCL fitting using CS metrics.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Optometry
- Vision Science
Background:
- Presbyopia affects near vision, often managed with multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs).
- Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a key visual function that may be influenced by MFCLs.
- Evaluating the impact of MFCLs on CS is crucial for optimizing visual performance in presbyopic patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and analyze published scientific evidence on the effects of MFCLs on distance and near contrast sensitivity in presbyopia correction.
- To assess the quality of existing research regarding MFCLs and contrast sensitivity.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a bibliographic search across PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Scopus for relevant studies published between 2000 and 2024.
- Included controlled clinical trials evaluating distance and/or near CS in presbyopic patients using MFCLs.
- Utilized the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool to assess the quality of included studies.
Main Results:
- Eight articles were included in the review, with varying findings on contrast sensitivity function (CSF).
- Some studies found no significant changes in CS with specific MFCL designs (center-distance/center-near) or compared to monovision.
- Other studies reported significant differences when comparing MFCLs to spectacles, with some MFCLs showing worse visual performance than pinhole lenses. Study quality varied, with CASP scores ranging from 5/13 to 8/13.
Conclusions:
- The current evidence base regarding the impact of MFCLs on contrast sensitivity is limited and lacks generalizable conclusions.
- Only a few studies indicate a variable impact of MFCLs on CS, with insufficient evidence to support the clinical benefit of using CS for MFCL fitting and optimization.
- Further high-quality research is required to establish definitive conclusions and clinical utility of contrast sensitivity assessment in multifocal contact lens wear for presbyopia.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

