Related Experiment Videos
Revision of the sentence completion test for ego development.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|February 1, 1985
Summary
New Washington University Sentence Completion Test forms offer improved comparability for men and women. Revised items and scoring manuals enhance data collection for psychological assessments.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Personality testing
- Clinical psychology
Background:
- The Washington University Sentence Completion Test (WUSCT) is a widely used projective test.
- Previous versions may have shown differences in performance or interpretation between genders.
- The need for gender-comparable assessment tools is crucial in psychological research and practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce new, revised forms of the Washington University Sentence Completion Test.
- To enhance the gender comparability of the WUSCT.
- To improve the validity and reliability of sentence completion measures.
Main Methods:
- Development of new WUSCT forms with revised items.
- Creation of gender-specific or combined scoring manuals for test stems.
- Strategic ordering of items to optimize participant cooperation and response independence.
- Analysis of item validity using data from diverse samples and previous WUSCT forms.
Main Results:
- New WUSCT forms demonstrate close comparability between men and women.
- Median item validity was slightly higher for women (.50) than men (.46), a difference explained by sample variance.
- Impersonal stems showed higher validity for men, leading to their increased inclusion in new forms.
Conclusions:
- The revised WUSCT forms provide a more equitable and potentially more valid assessment tool for both genders.
- The inclusion of more impersonal stems may improve the assessment of men.
- These revisions contribute to more accurate psychological evaluations and research findings.