Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>In vitro</i> transcribed circRNA as a therapeutic agent for cancer.

Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B·2026
Same author

Low DYNLL1 Resists <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i>-Induced Epithelial Jamming-Like State.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same author

Transient Overcoordination Unlocks C-H Bond Activation in Boron-Based Oxidative Dehydrogenation.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same authorSame journal

Peri-Implant Tissue Stability Following Guided Bone Regeneration With Bioceramic: A Multicenter One-Year Cohort Study.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2026
Same author

Periodontitis-Associated Circulating EVs Promote Colorectal Cancer Progression via Carnosine-Mediated Acidosis Adaptation.

Cell proliferation·2026
Same author

Soil nutrient stability outperforms microbial abundance stability as an early-warning indicator in a Tibetan alpine meadow under seasonal asymmetric warming.

Journal of environmental management·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
08:41

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.2K

Bioceramics for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yulan Wang1,2, Gang Fu3, Jian Zhang4

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
|January 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary

A novel bioceramic (BC) showed comparable bone regeneration and soft tissue healing to a control xenograft (BO) in guided bone regeneration (GBR) with implant placement. The bioceramic group had fewer complications, suggesting its potential for dental bone augmentation.

Keywords:
bioceramicsdental implantguided bone regenerationsynthetic materialxenograft

More Related Videos

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.6K
Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
08:41

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.2K
Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.6K
Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is crucial for dental implant success in patients with insufficient bone volume.
  • Comparing novel biomaterials with established bone graft substitutes is essential for advancing clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a novel bioceramic (BC) versus a control xenograft (BO) for GBR.
  • To assess bone regeneration, soft tissue healing, and complication rates when GBR is performed simultaneously with implant placement.

Main Methods:

  • A clinical study compared BC and BO in 152 patients requiring GBR and implant placement.
  • Outcomes included changes in buccal bone thickness (ΔHBBT) via CBCT, soft tissue healing assessments, and complication monitoring over 6 months.

Main Results:

  • Both BC and BO groups showed significant bone augmentation, with BC demonstrating less reduction in buccal bone thickness (-0.276 mm vs. -0.614 mm).
  • Soft tissue healing was comparable between groups, with minimal inflammatory changes observed.
  • The BC group exhibited a lower overall complication rate (3.95%) compared to the BO group.

Conclusions:

  • Both bioceramic and xenograft materials are effective for bone regeneration and soft tissue healing in simultaneous implant placement and GBR.
  • The novel bioceramic shows promise due to its comparable efficacy and reduced complication profile.