Medical negligence compensation claims in knee meniscal surgery in Norway: a cross-sectional study

Frank-David Øhrn1,2, Asbjørn Årøen3,4,5, Tommy Frøseth Aae6,7

  • 1Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Kristiansund Hospital, Kristiansund, Norway. frank-david.ohrn@helse-mr.no.

Patient Safety in Surgery
|January 17, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Compensation claims following meniscal surgery are rare. Men had more accepted claims, primarily due to higher infection rates, highlighting a need for surgical awareness.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Patient Safety
  • Medical Malpractice

Background:

  • Meniscal surgery is a common orthopaedic procedure globally.
  • Treatment errors can occur post-meniscal surgery, leading to patient compensation claims.
  • The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) handles these claims free of charge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze compensation claims filed after meniscal surgery.
  • To evaluate gender differences in accepted claims.
  • To identify common reasons for filing claims.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study of all NPE claims from 2010-2020.
  • Stratification of surgical procedures and data collection from the Norwegian Patient Registry.
  • Analysis of claim frequencies, relative frequencies, and gender differences using Pearson Chi-square test.

Main Results:

  • 119,528 meniscal procedures performed; 372 compensation claims filed (0.3%).
  • Accepted claims: 152 (40.9%); Rejected claims: 220 (59.1%).
  • Significant gender difference in accepted claims favoring men (p < 0.001), driven by higher infection rates in men.

Conclusions:

  • Compensation claims post-meniscal surgery are infrequent.
  • A higher incidence of postoperative infections in men led to a preponderance of accepted claims.
  • Surgeons should consider infection risk in pre-operative decision-making.