Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
[UPFRONT DOCETAXEL WITH ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY IN MALES WITH HIGH-VOLUME METASTATIC CASTRATION-SENSITIVE
Kenichi Hata1,2, Masaki Hashimoto1,2, Yusuke Takahashi1,2
1Department of Urology, Atsugi City Hospital.
Abstract:
(Objective) This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of upfront docetaxel (DTX) treatment and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in male patients with high-volume metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (HV-mCSPC). (Methods) This retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of 30 patients treated for HV-mCSPC by using upfront DTX treatment along with ADT at Atsugi City Hospital between December 2015 and December 2022. The patient characteristics, demographics, oncological outcomes, adverse events, and sequential therapy were evaluated. (Results) Thirty patients were included in the final analysis. The median patient age and prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis were 73 years (range, 53-83 years) and 250 mg/ml (range, 0.54-3,817 ng/ml), respectively. The completion rate of six cycles of upfront DTX treatment was 86.7%. The median progression-free survival was 24 months; the median overall survival was not reached, and the 5-year survival rate was 71.5%. Alopecia was the most frequent non-hematological adverse event (60%) followed by fatigue (53.3%). Overall, adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 46.7% of the patients, with neutropenia being the most frequent. The incidence of neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was significantly lower in the group receiving primary prophylaxis with long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (7.7% vs. 75%, P = 0.009). Abiraterone was the most frequently administered sequential treatment in 12 patients (60%). (Conclusion) In the triplet combination treatment era, upfront DTX treatment and ADT for patients with HV-mCSPC was safe as primary prophylaxis for severe neutropenia and effective as an upfront treatment. However, it should be selected if its effectiveness is superior to triplet treatment considering adverse events, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life.

