Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

00:08
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
7.0K
Expert Consensus Methods In The Humanities: An Exploration of their Potential.
Charlotte C S Rulkens1, Rik Peels2,3, Lidwine B Mokkink4,5
1Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
F1000Research
|January 24, 2025
Summary
Formal expert consensus methods, common in sciences, show promise for humanities research. Applying these structured approaches can enhance transparency, replicability, and fairness in humanities studies.
Area of Science:
- Interdisciplinary research
- Epistemology
- Humanities and Sciences
Background:
- Formal consensus methods are underutilized in humanities research compared to sciences.
- This study explores the applicability of expert consensus methods within humanities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the potential of expert consensus methods for humanities research.
- To identify suitable contexts and benefits of applying these methods in the humanities.
Main Methods:
- An interdisciplinary team reviewed literature and conducted brainstorm sessions.
- Expertise from both sciences (consensus methods) and humanities (epistemology) was combined.
Main Results:
- Identified six key elements of expert consensus methods.
- Cataloged various consensus methods (e.g., Delphi, nominal groups) used in sciences.
- Provided examples from both science and humanities studies.
Conclusions:
- Humanities research issues may benefit from structured expert consensus methods.
- These methods can accelerate epistemic processes, enhance transparency, and increase replicability in humanities.
- Application can stimulate diversity and encourage fair processes in humanities research and its applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Humanistic Psychology
1.0K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
1.0K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Archival Research
15.9K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
15.9K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

