Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

11:10
Visualization of Vascular and Parenchymal Regeneration after 70% Partial Hepatectomy in Normal Mice
Published on: September 13, 2016
8.0K
Finding Value in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: When Does Volume Matter?
Benjamin K Wang1, Madhukar S Patel1, Christine Hwang1
1Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
The Journal of Surgical Research
|January 24, 2025
Summary
Higher volume pediatric liver transplant centers improve outcomes for very young recipients (0-4 years). This suggests regionalizing care for these patients may enhance graft survival and value-based outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Transplantation Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Pediatric liver transplantation significantly improves survival rates.
- Value-based healthcare models are increasingly important but understudied in pediatric transplantation.
- Defining value in pediatric liver transplantation is crucial for optimizing outcomes and managing costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between pediatric liver transplant center volume and value of care.
- To assess how center volume impacts graft survival and resource utilization in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
- To determine if a volume-value relationship exists across different pediatric age groups.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of deceased donor pediatric liver transplant recipients (n=5770) from 2002-2019 using UNOS data.
- Centers categorized into volume tertiles (small, medium, large); recipients stratified by age (0-4, 5-11, 12-18 years).
- Value defined as % 1-year graft survival / mean post-transplant length of stay; Mahalanobis matching used to control for confounders.
Main Results:
- Large centers showed better 1-year graft survival (93.7%) than small centers (89.4%) without increased length of stay.
- A volume-value relationship (better outcomes, less resource use) was observed in the 0-4 age group.
- The 0-4 age group had the highest proportion of status 1B patients and partial allograft use.
Conclusions:
- Liver transplant center volume is associated with value in very young (0-4 years) pediatric recipients.
- Higher volume centers provide improved survival for this young population.
- Regionalization of care may be beneficial for improving outcomes in very young pediatric liver transplant recipients.

