Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lack of comparability between CEA analyses using three different methods.

H Davidson, D R Pledger, A Belfield

    Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Chemical availability of fallout radionuclides in cryoconite.

    Journal of environmental radioactivity·2023
    Same author

    Characteristics and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in healthcare workers at a London teaching hospital.

    The Journal of hospital infection·2020
    Same author

    Hepatitis B vaccination is effective by subcutaneous route in children with bleeding disorders: a universal data collection database analysis.

    Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2014
    Same author

    Peripheral nerve blockade for anaesthesia in a patient with bullous pemphigoid.

    Anaesthesia and intensive care·2014
    Same author

    Attitudes and back belts in the workplace.

    Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
    Same author

    Multicentre cohort study of red blood cell use for revision hip arthroplasty and factors associated with greater risk of allogeneic blood transfusion.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2011
    Same journal

    Routine laboratory triage for NT-proBNP elevation may reflect cardiorenal frailty as much as heart failure specificity.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    From interpretable NT-proBNP prediction to equitable laboratory stewardship.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Serum Sclerostin Levels in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Population-Specific HOMA-IR Reference Ranges in Iraq: Defining Insulin Sensitivity in a Middle Eastern Cohort.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Optimizing Laboratory Quality with Sigma Metrics: Application of CLIA 2024 Total Allowable Error Guidelines.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Suspected thermal amplitude of cryoglobulin likely more clinically significant than size detected: A case report.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
    See all related articles

    Different methods for measuring carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) yield varying results. Standard preparations did not significantly impact CEA assay outcomes within the same system, highlighting the need for method standardization.

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Biochemistry
    • Clinical Chemistry

    Background:

    • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a tumor marker.
    • Accurate measurement of CEA is crucial for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.
    • Standardization of CEA assays is essential for reliable clinical interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the performance of three different assay methods for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).
    • To evaluate the impact of two distinct standard preparations on CEA assay results.
    • To discuss the implications of assay variability for routine clinical practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Investigated radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for CEA.
    • Utilized two CEA standard preparations: 1st British Standard (73/601) and a commercial IRMA kit standard.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assayed serum samples using each method and standard, comparing the obtained results.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in CEA assay results were observed when comparing the three different measurement methods.
    • No significant differences were found between the two standard preparations when used within the same assay system.
    • Assay method choice demonstrably impacts CEA quantification.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of assay method significantly influences carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement outcomes.
    • Standard preparations may not fully account for inter-method variability in CEA assays.
    • Further investigation into method-specific standardization is recommended for routine CEA testing.