Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Microglial Interactions with Stress-Response Circuitry Using the Limited Bedding and Nesting Model
Published on: July 12, 2024
Dimensions of perinatal and childhood adversities both merge and remain distinct
Eric R Larson1, Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks1
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Background:
Perinatal and childhood periods are sensitive windows of development wherein adversity exposure can result in disadvantageous outcomes. Data-driven dimensional approaches that appreciate the co-occurrence of adversities allow for extending beyond specificity (individual adversities) and cumulative risk (non-specific summation of adversities) approaches to understand how the type and timing of adversities affect outcomes.
Objective:
With evolving recommendations on what should be important in adversity research, we sought to establish a data-driven framework that accounts for both type and timing of adversity by (1) replicating dimensions of childhood adversities, (2) determining whether perinatal adversities form unique dimensions and (3) identifying whether adversities during the perinatal and childhood periods overlap or remain distinct.
Methods:
Using 6815 9-10-year-olds from the baseline Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, mixed graphical models were fit independently to childhood adversities and perinatal adversities, and simultaneously to perinatal and childhood adversities, to model relationships among adversities.
Results:
Data-driven clustering approaches estimated dimensions of adversity within networks. Six dimensions of childhood adversities and five dimensions of perinatal adversities were observed. When considered simultaneously, dimensions of perinatal and childhood adversities both merged (e.g., parental circumstances during perinatal and socioeconomic status during childhood) and stayed independent (e.g., obstetric complications during perinatal and neglect during childhood) underscoring the importance of considering both type and timing when studying early life adversity.
Conclusions:
These results highlight that it may be appropriate to study certain adversity dimensions independently, whereas for others considering the impact of timing and potential continuity in exposure is critical. Recommendations for adversity research are discussed.
More Related Videos
05:44Author Spotlight: Collecting the Brain and Serum from the Same Mice Fetus to Study Brain Tumor Development
Published on: May 17, 2024
06:39Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Adler's Individual Psychology
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Nature and Nurture
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and...