Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

5.7K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
5.7K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

85
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
85
The Replisome03:01

The Replisome

32.9K
DNA replication is carried out by a large complex of proteins that act in a coordinated matter to achieve high-fidelity DNA replication. Together this complex is known as the DNA replication machinery or the replisome.
The synthesis of the leading and lagging strands is a highly coordinated process. To explain this, the “Trombone model” was proposed by Bruce Alberts in 1980. The DNA loop formation starts when a primer is synthesized on the parent lagging strand. The loop grows with...
32.9K
Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

170.2K
Overview
170.2K
The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

35.5K
An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication...
35.5K
S-Cdk Initiates DNA Replication02:38

S-Cdk Initiates DNA Replication

4.6K
The cell cycle is a series of events leading to DNA duplication followed by the division of cell content to form two daughter cells. The cell cycle progresses in four stages—the cell increases in size (gap 1 or G1-phase), duplicates its DNA (synthesis or S-phase), prepares to divide (gap 2 or G2-phase), and divides (mitosis or M-phase).
Two states at the origin of replication
In eukaryotes, the initiation of replication occurs at many sites on the chromosomes, called the origins of...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of polygenic risk score communication on short term health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ medicine·2026
Same author

Replicability of multivariate brain-behaviour associations depends on clinical profile.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Reclassification and weighting of multiple causes of death: US death certificates 2003-2023.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Are Semantic Representations Stable? A Bayesian Framework Applied to the Study of Quantifier Meaning.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Single-molecule nanophotonic resolution of binding dynamics from apo to fully liganded for a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel in cell-derived vesicles.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A retinotopic wiring principle of the human brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

A predisposing effect of HLA class II genes in celiac disease by skewing the naive CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell receptor repertoire.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Wave propagation in fluid-saturated nanoporous media: Upscaling molecular mechanics into continuum-level description.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Collagen-producing eye cell atlas reveals distinct fibroblast fates in early injury vs. fibrotic subretinal disease.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Knotted solid tori in contact manifolds.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Biophysical fitness landscape design traps viral evolution.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Cryo-EM of the eukaryotic purine transporter UapA demonstrates intramolecular and lipid regulation of transport.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2025

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test
08:16

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Published on: September 3, 2015

11.1K

How can we make sound replication decisions?

Clintin P Davis-Stober1,2, Alexandra Sarafoglou3, Balazs Aczel4

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|January 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientists face limited resources when deciding to replicate research. This perspective offers a framework to evaluate replication strategies and tools, like preregistration, to maximize scientific impact.

Keywords:
methodologyreformreplicationreproducibility

More Related Videos

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication
10:28

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

22.3K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

390

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test
08:16

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Published on: September 3, 2015

11.1K
Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication
10:28

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

22.3K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

390

Area of Science:

  • Scientific research methodology
  • Reproducibility in science

Background:

  • Replication crises and research integrity are major concerns across scientific fields.
  • Reforms in publishing and experimental design aim to improve scientific rigor.
  • Coordinated multi-laboratory replications are increasing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine scientists' values and attitudes regarding research replication.
  • To provide a conceptual framework for assessing replication strategies and tools.

Main Methods:

  • This is a perspective piece, not an empirical study.
  • It involves conceptual analysis of scientific values and attitudes towards replication.
  • Discussion of tools like preregistration for enhancing replication utility.

Main Results:

  • Limited resources necessitate careful consideration of replication efforts.
  • A framework is proposed to guide decisions on which findings to replicate and how.
  • Preregistration is highlighted as a valuable tool for assessing replication usefulness.

Conclusions:

  • Strategic decision-making is crucial for effective research replication.
  • Balancing scientific rigor with resource constraints is essential.
  • The proposed framework aids scientists in optimizing replication endeavors.