Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
Distractor-response binding influences visual search
Fredrik Allenmark1, Hao Yu2, Hermann J Müller2
1General and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, Munich, Germany. fredrik.allenmark@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Intertrial priming effects in visual search and action control suggest the involvement of binding and retrieval processes. However, the role of distractor-response binding (DRB) in visual search has been largely overlooked, and the specific processing stage within the functional architecture of attentional guidance where the DRB occurs remains unclear. To address these gaps, we implemented two search tasks, where participants responded based on a separate feature from the one defining the target. We kept the target dimension consistent across trials while varying the color and shape of the distractor. Moreover, we either repeated or randomized the target position in different sessions. Our results revealed a pronounced response priming, a difference between trials where the response changed versus repeated, and importantly this response priming was stronger when distractor features or the target position were repeated than when they changed. These insights affirm the presence of DRB during visual search and support the framework of binding and retrieval in action control as a basis for observed intertrial priming effects related to distractor features. All data are available at: https://github.com/msenselab/distractor_binding .
More Related Videos
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
08:45A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014