Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
Published on: January 6, 2023
Classification of Hearing Status Based on Pupil Measures During Sentence Perception.
Patrycja Lebiecka-Johansen1,2, Adriana A Zekveld1, Dorothea Wendt2,3
1Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands.
Pupil dilation measures can help differentiate listening effort in people with normal hearing versus hearing impairment. Machine learning models reveal how pupil responses vary with hearing status, signal-to-noise ratio, and task accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Human Auditory Perception
- Oculomotor Physiology
Background:
- Speech understanding in noise is challenging, particularly for individuals with hearing impairment (HI).
- HI listeners may alter listening effort allocation compared to normal-hearing (NH) peers.
- Pupil dilation responses may reflect these differences in effort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the sensitivity of pupil measures to hearing-related changes in listening effort.
- To investigate how pupil measures differentiate between NH and HI listeners during speech perception in noise.
- To utilize a machine learning framework to rank pupil measures based on their sensitivity to hearing status, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and task response.
Main Methods:
- Collected pupil data from 32 NH and 32 HI listeners during an adaptive speech reception threshold test.
- Calculated various pupil measures including Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD), Mean Pupil Dilation (MPD), Principal Pupil Components (RPCs), and Baseline Pupil Size (BPS).
- Employed a machine learning classification framework to assess the ability to predict hearing status, SNR, and task response using pupil measures.
Main Results:
- A combination of pupil measures was required for accurate classification of hearing status, SNR, and task response.
- Established measures like PPD, RPC2, and BPS, along with novel measures RPC1 and RPC3, were key predictors.
- Classification performance varied depending on the factor being predicted and the specific pupil measures used.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning can effectively rank pupil measures by their sensitivity to factors influencing speech perception in noise.
- Pupil responses are sensitive to hearing status, SNR, and task demands, allowing for reasonable classification.
- Different pupil measures are affected differently by these factors, enhancing our understanding of their utility in auditory research.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...