Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
Antibiotics and Surgically Treated Acute Appendicitis, When, Where, and Why?
Andrew Hendrix1, Alexander Kammien2, Adrian A Maung2
1University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Pre-incisional antibiotics (POA) did not reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing emergency appendectomy who already received emergency department antibiotics (EDA). Factors like perforation and male gender were associated with organ-space SSIs, not POA.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Infection Prevention
- Emergency Medicine
- Antibiotic Stewardship
Background:
- Pre-incisional antibiotics (POA) are standard for clean-contaminated surgery to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs).
- Patients undergoing emergency surgery for intra-abdominal infections often receive emergency department antibiotics (EDA), potentially negating POA benefits.
- This study investigated the efficacy of POA in emergency appendectomy patients already treated with EDA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if pre-incisional cefazolin reduces SSIs in patients undergoing emergency appendectomy.
- To identify factors associated with SSIs in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1380 patients undergoing emergency appendectomy (2013-2020).
- Data abstracted included demographics, appendicitis severity, comorbidities, and antibiotic administration (EDA and POA).
- Logistic regression models assessed the impact of POA and other factors on superficial/deep and organ-space SSIs.
Main Results:
- POA was not predictive of SSI (p=0.632).
- Perforation (OR: 17.08) and male gender (OR: 2.75) were associated with organ-space SSIs; pre-incisional cefazolin was not (OR: 0.83).
- Emergency department broad-spectrum antibiotics (EDA) were associated with lower superficial/deep infection (OR: 0.06), but pre-incisional cefazolin was not (OR: 0.71).
Conclusions:
- Additional pre-incisional cefazolin does not reduce SSIs in emergency appendectomy patients who have received EDA.
- Focusing on timely EDA and managing factors like perforation and gender may be more critical for SSI prevention in this group.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Tonsillitis II: Management
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy

