Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Optimal timing of endoscopic sagittal suturectomy
Patrick F O'Brien1, Saige A Teti1, Callum Dewar2
11Department of Neurological Surgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Insights
Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) for sagittal craniosynostosis can be beneficial for infants over 3 months old. However, younger infants may achieve better cephalic index correction and require fewer transfusions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurosurgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
- Infant Health
Background:
- Sagittal craniosynostosis is a common condition in infants.
- Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) is a standard treatment.
- Optimal surgical timing for ESS is debated, with many favoring <3 months.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if infant age at ESS surgery impacts craniometric correction.
- To assess if older infants (>3 months) have less correction.
- To investigate age-related differences in blood transfusion rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 107 infants undergoing ESS for sagittal craniosynostosis (2009-2023).
- Patients stratified by age groups (0-2, 2-3, >3 months) to compare outcomes.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify optimal age cutoffs.
Main Results:
- Infants >3 months showed less cephalic index (CI) correction at final follow-up (25.0% vs 61.5%, p=0.031).
- Older infants (>3 months) had reduced mean CI change and helmet discontinuation rates.
- Younger infants (median 2 months) were more likely to require transfusion (p=0.028).
Conclusions:
- ESS may still benefit infants >3 months old with sagittal craniosynostosis.
- Optimal age for ESS and factors influencing outcomes require further study.
- Age cutoffs of 3.75 months for CI correction and 2.75 months for transfusion avoidance were identified.
Objective:
Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) is commonly offered for sagittal craniosynostosis in infants, but the optimal timing of surgery remains controversial, with many clinicians only offering ESS surgery before 3 months of age. This study investigated whether patient age predicts craniometric correction and, more specifically, whether patients > 3 months of age at surgery manifest less correction. The effects of age on blood transfusion were also investigated.
Methods:
A single-center retrospective review identifying patients with sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent ESS between 2009 and 2023 at Children's National Medical Center was performed. The authors stratified patients by age groups to compare outcomes and transfusion rates. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed to identify optimal age cutoffs.
Results:
In total, 107 patients were included. Stratifying age group by 0-2 months, 2-3 months, and > 3 months revealed that the > 3-month age group was less likely to achieve the target cephalic index (CI) at the final follow-up (48.8% vs 61.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.031) and had less mean percentage CI change at the 6-month follow-up (17% ± 8% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.011), helmet discontinuation (18% ± 9% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.008), 1-year follow-up (15% ± 9% vs 17% ± 7% vs 10% ± 7%, p = 0.005), and final follow-up (14% ± 9% vs 15% ± 7% vs 8% ± 7%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-2 months versus > 2 months of age. The only difference in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-3 months versus > 3 months of age was the mean percentage change in CI at helmet removal (18% ± 8% vs 15% ± 7%, p = 0.044). Patients requiring transfusion were likely to be younger (median age 2 vs 3 months, p = 0.028). ROC curve analysis identified an age cut-point of 3.75 months as optimal for achieving the target CI correction at the final follow-up (AUC 0.58) and 2.75 months for transfusion avoidance (AUC 0.65).
Conclusions:
Patients > 3 months of age may benefit from ESS for sagittal craniosynostosis. Further investigation is warranted to identify the optimal age for surgery and to investigate other variables influencing outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:53Role of Diffusion MRI Tractography in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
Published on: July 5, 2021
03:24Author Spotlight: Development and Application of a Novel Suture Technique for Annular Fibrosus Repair in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy
Published on: January 26, 2024