Optimal timing of endoscopic sagittal suturectomy

Patrick F O'Brien1, Saige A Teti1, Callum Dewar2

  • 11Department of Neurological Surgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.

PubMed

Insights

Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) for sagittal craniosynostosis can be beneficial for infants over 3 months old. However, younger infants may achieve better cephalic index correction and require fewer transfusions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • Craniofacial Surgery
  • Infant Health

Background:

  • Sagittal craniosynostosis is a common condition in infants.
  • Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) is a standard treatment.
  • Optimal surgical timing for ESS is debated, with many favoring <3 months.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if infant age at ESS surgery impacts craniometric correction.
  • To assess if older infants (>3 months) have less correction.
  • To investigate age-related differences in blood transfusion rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 107 infants undergoing ESS for sagittal craniosynostosis (2009-2023).
  • Patients stratified by age groups (0-2, 2-3, >3 months) to compare outcomes.
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify optimal age cutoffs.

Main Results:

  • Infants >3 months showed less cephalic index (CI) correction at final follow-up (25.0% vs 61.5%, p=0.031).
  • Older infants (>3 months) had reduced mean CI change and helmet discontinuation rates.
  • Younger infants (median 2 months) were more likely to require transfusion (p=0.028).

Conclusions:

  • ESS may still benefit infants >3 months old with sagittal craniosynostosis.
  • Optimal age for ESS and factors influencing outcomes require further study.
  • Age cutoffs of 3.75 months for CI correction and 2.75 months for transfusion avoidance were identified.
Abstract