Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Published on: February 7, 2014
Assessing the Validity of Computerized Algorithms for Determining Pulse Wave Velocity: A Clinical Study
Amira Tairi1, Hasan Obeid2, Saliha Addour2
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
The study found that the second-derivative and intersecting tangents algorithms for calculating pulse wave velocity (PWV) yield negligible differences in results. This suggests no need to adjust PWV measurements based on the algorithm used for pulse transit time determination.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), is a key cardiovascular risk factor.
- Accurate PWV measurement relies on precise identification of the pulse waveform foot.
- Existing methods, such as second-derivative and intersecting tangents algorithms, can produce differing PWV results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare pulse transit time (PTT) and PWV calculated by second-derivative and intersecting tangents algorithms.
- To evaluate differences when both algorithms process identical input signals.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 3,770 pairs of filtered pulse waves from 113 subjects using MATLAB.
- Calculated PTT and PWV with second-derivative (PTTMat-2nd, PWVMat-2nd) and intersecting tangents (PTTMat-IT, PWVMat-IT) algorithms.
- Compared results with Complior (PWVComp-2nd) and SphygmoCor (PWVSphyg-IT) systems.
Main Results:
- Mean PTT values were nearly identical: 54.55 ± 18.55 ms (2nd derivative) vs. 54.61 ± 18.61 ms (intersecting tangents).
- Mean PWV values showed minimal differences: 0.01 ± 0.32 m/s between MATLAB algorithms (PWVMat-2nd vs. PWVMat-IT).
- Differences between device-specific algorithms were also small: 0.11 ± 0.66 m/s (PWVComp-2nd vs. PWVSphyg-IT).
Conclusions:
- The differences in PWV calculated by the second-derivative and intersecting tangents algorithms are negligible.
- No adjustment is needed for PWV measurements based on the algorithm used for PTT determination.
- This finding simplifies the interpretation of PWV measurements across different analytical approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

