Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
Neonatal and maternal dietary interventions driving microbiota and functionality in piglet gut compartments
Dirkjan Schokker1,2, Mariëlle H van den Esker3, Alex Bossers3
1Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. dirkjan.schokker@wur.nl.
Administering feed additives like medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), beta-glucans (BG), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) to piglets before weaning impacts gut health. The route of administration—maternal or neonatal—significantly influences the outcomes and effectiveness of these gut health interventions.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Gut Health
- Immunology
Background:
- Early-life gut health is crucial for piglet development and performance.
- Traditional feed additive administration occurs post-weaning, potentially missing critical developmental windows.
- The impact of administration route (maternal vs. neonatal) on gut functionality remains underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of maternal (lactation feed) versus neonatal (oral gavage) administration of feed additives on piglet gut functionality.
- To investigate the influence of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), beta-glucans (BG), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) on gut health markers.
- To determine the optimal administration route for different feed additives in early-life piglets.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of maternal and neonatal administration routes for MCFA, BG, and GOS in piglets.
- Analysis of gut microbial diversity (alpha and beta diversity) at different time points.
- Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis to assess molecular responses in the gut.
- Pathway enrichment analysis to identify affected biological processes.
Main Results:
- Maternal MCFA administration altered alpha diversity and gene expression related to immune processes and metabolism.
- Neonatal MCFA administration primarily affected genes related to cell adhesion.
- Significant differences in diversity and gene expression were observed when comparing administration routes, with MCFA showing a more pronounced differential response.
- BG and GOS also induced distinct gene expression patterns associated with metabolism and immune signaling depending on the administration route.
Conclusions:
- Both the type of feed additive and the route of administration significantly influence piglet gut functionality.
- MCFA demonstrated a more complex and differential response based on administration route compared to BG and GOS.
- Determining the optimal administration route is critical for maximizing the benefits of nutritional interventions in young pigs.
More Related Videos
08:50A Murine Model of Fetal Exposure to Maternal Inflammation to Study the Effects of Acute Chorioamnionitis on Newborn Intestinal Development
Published on: June 24, 2020
09:13Two-dimensional Porcine Intestinal Organoids Reflecting the Physiological Properties of Native Gut
Published on: January 31, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
What is Monogastric Digestion?