Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

627
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
627
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.1K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

74.7K
Scientific Laws
74.7K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Models, Theories, and Laws01:16

Models, Theories, and Laws

5.0K
Scientists frequently use models to help them comprehend a specific collection of phenomena. In physics, a model is a condensed version of a physical system that is too complex to study thoroughly. One such example is the light wave model; unlike water waves, light waves are typically invisible to us. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think of light as being composed of waves, since investigations show that light behaves like water waves. Since it is impossible to visually see what is genuinely...
5.0K
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI01:30

Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI

26
Adopting a healthier lifestyle often requires overcoming significant challenges, but leveraging psychological, social, and cultural resources can facilitate meaningful change. Effective self-change hinges on understanding and applying key tools such as motivation and goal setting, which help sustain efforts toward long-term health benefits.
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
26

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The need for a global effort to attend to human neural organoid and assembloid research.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Will an Enhanced Child Have Less Freedom? A U.S. Nationally Representative Survey Experiment.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same author

A Reset for Bioethics: A Statement from the Global Observatory for Genome Editing.

The CRISPR journal·2025
Same author

Translational Bioethical Decision-Making: Human Brain Organoids as a Case Study.

Ethics & human research·2024
Same author

Scientism, trust, value alignment, views of nature, and U.S. public opinion about gene drive mosquitos.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2024
Same author

Personhood and the Public's Definitions of a Human.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting
11:12

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Published on: November 4, 2021

3.4K

Religion v. Science? No and Yes.

John H Evans

    The Hastings Center Report
    |March 5, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Religious objections in bioethics often stem from moral, not factual, disagreements with science. Accurate representation of these conflicts is crucial for public trust in bioethical policy debates.

    Keywords:
    Covidbioethical debateconflictreligionscience

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting
    05:05

    Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting

    Published on: May 31, 2024

    875
    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
    06:42

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

    Published on: September 28, 2018

    11.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 24, 2025

    Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting
    11:12

    Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

    Published on: November 4, 2021

    3.4K
    Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting
    05:05

    Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting

    Published on: May 31, 2024

    875
    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
    06:42

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

    Published on: September 28, 2018

    11.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Social Science
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Many believe the public's religious views conflict with scientific facts.
    • Conflicts are often moral, not factual, particularly in bioethics.
    • Accurate conflict representation is vital for public legitimacy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To differentiate between moral and factual conflicts in bioethics.
    • To address the myth of religious opposition to scientific facts.
    • To highlight the importance of understanding moral conflicts.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of social science research on public attitudes.
    • Examination of bioethical debates and public health issues.
    • Case study of religious objections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Main Results:

    • Widespread moral conflict exists between scientists and the actively religious in the U.S.
    • Fact-based conflicts are rare and often irrelevant to bioethics.
    • Religious objections to COVID-19 vaccines were primarily moral.

    Conclusions:

    • Bioethical debates should focus on moral conflicts, not perceived factual disagreements.
    • Understanding the nature of religious objections is key to effective bioethical discourse.
    • Legitimizing bioethical input requires accurate portrayal of public conflicts.