Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

32
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
32
Field Application of Global Positioning System01:28

Field Application of Global Positioning System

23
The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become an indispensable tool in fieldwork, offering unparalleled precision and efficiency for surveying, navigation, and infrastructure development. By harnessing signals from a constellation of satellites, GPS receivers determine the location of objects with remarkable speed and accuracy, often completing calculations within a second.Advantages of Modern GPS TechnologyContemporary GPS receivers are designed to meet the practical demands of field...
23
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

18
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
18
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys01:30

Types of Global Positioning System Surveys

43
GPS surveying methods vary in application, accuracy, and data collection techniques, catering to diverse surveying and mapping needs. Static GPS, kinematic GPS, and real-time kinematic (RTK) surveying are widely used. Each technique offers distinct advantages.Static GPS involves placing one receiver at a known reference point and another at the target point. It collects exact positional data by observing multiple satellite ranges over an extended period, achieving centimeter-level accuracy for...
43
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

38
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
38
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

58
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
58

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fourier Ambiguity Validation for Carrier-Phase GNSS.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

On the Problem of Double-Filtering in PPP-RTK.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

A hybrid optical-wireless network for decimetre-level terrestrial positioning.

Nature·2022
Same author

Experimental Evaluation of Smartphone Accelerometer and Low-Cost Dual Frequency GNSS Sensors for Deformation Monitoring.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Precision and Reliability of Tightly Coupled PPP GNSS and Landmark Monocular Vision Positioning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Multi-GNSS PPP-RTK: From Large- to Small-Scale Networks.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2025

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings
00:08

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings

Published on: September 30, 2019

6.2K

Performance of ambiguity-resolved detector for GNSS mixed-integer model.

Chengyu Yin1, P J G Teunissen1,2,3, C C J M Tiberius1

  • 1Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

GPS Solutions
|March 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The ambiguity-resolved (AR) detection theory enhances Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) model validation. AR detectors show superior performance over ambiguity-float (AF) detectors in identifying GNSS model misspecifications.

Keywords:
Ambiguity resolutionGNSSMixed-integer modelModel validationMonte Carlo simulation

More Related Videos

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

2.9K
Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings
00:08

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings

Published on: September 30, 2019

6.2K
Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

2.9K
Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Geodesy
  • Satellite Navigation Systems
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) models require robust validation techniques.
  • Mixed-integer models in GNSS present unique challenges for validation.
  • Existing detectors like ambiguity-float (AF) and ambiguity-known (AK) have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of the ambiguity-resolved (AR) detection theory for GNSS mixed-integer model validation.
  • To compare the AR detector's efficacy against AF and AK detectors.
  • To analyze the power of AR detectors under various misspecification scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis and simulation experiments were conducted.
  • Performance evaluation involved computing detection power as a function of model misspecification.
  • Single- and dual-frequency GPS models were used in simulations.
  • Power functions were derived for diverse user locations, observation models, and satellite geometries.

Main Results:

  • The AR detector demonstrated higher detection power than the AF detector, even with success rates below one.
  • Simulations showed increased detection probability for ionosphere and troposphere delays (47% and 60% on average, respectively) with AR.
  • AR detection power surpassed AF detector power in multi-dimensional misspecification cases.
  • The study quantified detection power across 25 user locations, 5 observation models, and 72 satellite geometries.

Conclusions:

  • The AR detection theory provides a more powerful tool for GNSS mixed-integer model validation compared to AF detectors.
  • AR detectors effectively increase the probability of detecting atmospheric delays and multi-dimensional misspecifications.
  • The findings support the adoption of AR detection for improved GNSS data quality and reliability.