Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.6K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.6K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

10.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A computational psychological approach to complex emotion: interest links complex emotion and attractiveness.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Development and validation of the Thoughts on Eating Scale: a domain-specific measure of belief orientations toward eating.

BMC psychology·2026
Same authorSame journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Anatomical-connectivity-guided functional connectivity reveals task-relevant pathways during proactive task-switching via recurrent graph neural networks.

Brain informatics·2026
Same author

Evaluating human perceptions of android robot facial expressions based on variations in instruction styles.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Cross-modal congruency between haptic and visual objects affects involuntary shifts in spatial attention.

Perception·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.1K

Does information predicting "when" and "what" facilitate target detection interactively?

Byungju Kim1, Ryoichi Nakashima1, Takatsune Kumada1

  • 1Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|March 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Both informative cues and predictable timing improve target detection, but they do not interact. This research enhances understanding of human responses to environmental cues and timing predictability.

Keywords:
Cue informativenessassistance systemsresponse facilitationtiming predictability

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.1K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Human factors engineering

Background:

  • Human adaptation to environments relies on processing environmental stimuli.
  • Cue informativeness and timing predictability significantly influence behavioral guidance.
  • The interactive effects of cue informativeness and timing predictability on human responses are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the combined influence of cue informativeness and timing predictability on target detection responses.
  • To determine if cue informativeness and timing predictability interact in modulating human performance.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a cued go/no-go task in an online experiment.
  • Cue informativeness was manipulated (informative vs. non-informative).
  • Timing predictability was manipulated (constant cue-target delay vs. variable delays).

Main Results:

  • Both informative cues and predictable timing individually facilitated target detection responses.
  • No significant interaction was found between cue informativeness and timing predictability.
  • Findings were replicated under more challenging conditions in a second experiment.

Conclusions:

  • Cue informativeness and timing predictability independently enhance performance in target detection tasks.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for designing effective human-assistance systems.
  • Insights can optimize operator performance and system interaction.