Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
Published on: March 3, 2023
Comparison of structure-function correlation among IMO visual function analyser and Humphrey field analyser
Joyce Kang1,2, Rafaella Nascimento E Silva3, Julia Anne Kim3
1Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
The IMO visual function analyser (IMOvifa) offers a faster glaucoma assessment than the Humphrey field analyser (HFA), with comparable structure-function correlations using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Both perimeters demonstrate moderate to strong correlations between visual field sensitivity and retinal layer thickness.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Technology
- Glaucoma Research
Background:
- Accurate structure-function correlation is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma.
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides objective measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness.
- Visual field testing assesses retinal sensitivity, a key functional parameter in glaucoma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare structure-function correlations between OCT thickness parameters and visual field mean sensitivity (MS) values.
- To evaluate the performance of the IMO visual function analyser (IMOvifa) against the Humphrey field analyser (HFA).
Main Methods:
- Prospective cross-sectional study involving glaucoma suspects, glaucoma, and ocular hypertension patients.
- Simultaneous testing with IMOvifa, HFA, and OCT within 12 weeks.
- Analysis of structure-function correlations using Spearman's rank coefficient and comparison via Steiger's test, based on the Garway-Heath map.
Main Results:
- The IMOvifa demonstrated significantly shorter testing times (3.7 vs 5.3 minutes) and slightly less severe visual field defects compared to HFA.
- Moderate to strong correlations were found between IMOvifa and HFA MS values across sectors (p<0.001).
- IMOvifa showed significant correlations with peripapillary RNFL and macular GCIPL thickness in various sectors, with no significant difference in correlation strength compared to HFA (p≥0.06).
Conclusions:
- The IMOvifa is a faster alternative to HFA for visual field assessment in glaucoma patients.
- Both IMOvifa and HFA exhibit comparable and significant structure-function correlations with OCT parameters.
- Mean sensitivity in all sectors showed moderate to strong correlations, validating the functional assessment of retinal layers.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mass Analyzers: Overview
2D NMR: Heteronuclear Single-Quantum Correlation Spectroscopy (HSQC)

