Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Three-dimensional Optical-resolution Photoacoustic Microscopy
Published on: May 3, 2011
Method for Selecting the Down-Sampling Factor of Photoacoustic Image by Using Cumulative Power Difference in
Shihao Tang1, Min Wan1, Yameng Zhang2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract:
As a novel non-invasive imaging technology, a constraint of photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is its imaging speed. Often, PAM utilizes sparse spatial sampling, which necessitates extensive prior experimentation to accurately select the down-sampling factors. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a frequency-domain evaluation index, cumulative power difference (CPD), for rapid selection of the optimal down-sampling factor. We apply the proposed CPD to photoacoustic images of the ear and brain of the mouse. The result shows that as the down-sampling factor increases, there is a similar decreasing trend in the quality of the 20 images. CPD was significantly correlated with PCC/MSE/SSIM (p < 0.001). The findings suggest that CPD, with its ability to evaluate the quality of photoacoustic images and quickly quantify the quality loss of down-sampled images without prior inspection. This study contributes to expanding the application range of PAM and supporting its clinical prospects.
Related Concept Videos
Upsampling
Downsampling
The Fourier transform of the decimated sequence reveals a combination of scaled and shifted versions of the original spectrum. This...
Aliasing
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...
Bandpass Sampling
A bandpass signal has a spectrum with a lower frequency limit, denoted as ω1, and an upper frequency limit, denoted as ω2....
Sampling Theorem

