Related Experiment Videos
Crib-O-Gram vs. auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening.
The Laryngoscope
|July 1, 1985
Summary
Neonatal hearing screening using Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) showed inconsistent results. Many infants screened had middle ear issues, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of neonatal hearing tests.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal screening
- Audiology
- Pediatric audiology
Background:
- Neonatal hearing loss affects 1-3 per 1000 live births.
- Early detection and intervention are crucial for language and cognitive development.
- High-risk infants in the NICU require specialized screening protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To longitudinally evaluate Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) screening effectiveness in a high-risk neonatal population.
- To compare the reliability and failure rates of COG and ABR in NICU infants.
- To identify the underlying causes of screening failures.
Main Methods:
- Administered COG and two-intensity ABR (70 dB and 30 dB) to 190 NICU infants.
- Assessed COG reliability through multiple screenings.
- Followed up with repeated ABR and behavioral observation audiometry at 6 months for infants who failed screening.
Main Results:
- COG showed inconsistent results in 25% of infants.
- COG failure rate was 27.9% using a 2 out of 3 pass criterion.
- ABR failure rates were 17.9% (30 dB bilateral) and 30.0% (unilateral).
- One infant with significant hearing loss was identified from 78 infants undergoing follow-up.
- Middle ear problems were common in infants failing COG (66%) and ABR (over 50%).
Conclusions:
- Both COG and ABR have limitations in high-risk neonatal populations.
- Middle ear dysfunction is a frequent cause of false-positive results in neonatal hearing screening.
- Careful interpretation and follow-up are essential for accurate diagnosis of hearing loss in NICU infants.