Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
Published on: August 18, 2020
High-Potency Cannabis Use and Health: A Systematic Review of Observational and Experimental Studies
Stephanie Lake1, Conor H Murray1, Brittany Henry1
1UCLA Center for Cannabis and Cannabinoids, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, UCLA, Los Angeles (Lake, Murray, Henry, Strong, White, Cooper); Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Lake, Murray, Cooper) and Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine (Cooper), David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles; RAND Drug Policy Research Center, Santa Monica, CA (Kilmer).
Objective:
Amid continuously rising concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in cannabis (i.e., potency), high-potency cannabis is a major topic in contemporary cannabis policy discussions, yet its impact on health is not well understood. The authors conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between high-potency cannabis use and a range of health outcomes.
Methods:
Records were obtained from a systematic search of five biomedical research databases. The authors developed ecologically relevant potency (percent THC) exposure-comparison categories (1%-9%, 10%-19%, 20%-30%, kief/resin [∼30%-50%], concentrates [≥60%]) and used a landmark scientific report on cannabis and cannabinoids to determine outcome eligibility. Two reviewers independently conducted article screening and selection, extraction, and quality assessment. Findings were synthesized using both quantitative (association direction, binomial test) and narrative approaches. Certainty in the evidence was determined via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.
Results:
Of 4,545 screened records, 42 were eligible. Most studies addressed outcomes in the mental health, "problem" cannabis use, and other substance use domains. Findings in the "problem" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with higher-potency cannabis use. Findings were less consistent in other domains but tended to favor poorer outcomes with higher-potency use. Therapeutic outcomes were limited and mixed. Overall, certainty in the evidence was "very low."
Conclusions:
Findings within the "problem" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with high-potency use. Research is largely limited to cross-sectional studies spanning few adverse health domains, underscoring the need for prospective studies probing therapeutic, cardiorespiratory, cancer, and pre- and perinatal outcomes. Policies to curb high-potency cannabis use may be warranted while the evidence base improves.
Related Concept Videos
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Hallucinogens and Psychedelics
Marijuana, derived from the dried leaves and flowers of the hemp plant, contains...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

