Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

06:56
Antibody Transfection into Neurons as a Tool to Study Disease Pathogenesis
Published on: September 26, 2012
Research on Anti-Interference Performance of Spiking Neural Network Under Network Connection Damage
Yongqiang Zhang1, Haijie Pang2, Jinlong Ma2
1School of Communication Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Brain Sciences
|March 28, 2025
Summary
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) demonstrate superior anti-interference capabilities compared to artificial neural networks (ANNs) when subjected to network damage. SNNs maintain more stable performance in information processing and pattern recognition, highlighting their potential in electromagnetic protection bionics.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computational Neuroscience
- Bionics
Background:
- Memristors offer combined storage and computing, ideal for optimizing artificial intelligence (AI) and neural networks.
- Spiking neural networks (SNNs) exhibit inherent resistance to various interferences through synaptic plasticity.
- The anti-interference capabilities of SNNs are crucial for advancing electromagnetic protection bionics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To construct and evaluate spiking neural network (SNN) models against traditional artificial neural networks (ANNs).
- To investigate the anti-interference performance of SNNs and ANNs under simulated network connection damage.
- To compare the robustness of VGG-SNN and FCNN-SNN models using real-world and benchmark datasets.
Main Methods:
- Developed two SNN models (VGG-SNN, FCNN-SNN) using the Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neuron model.
- Employed a pruning algorithm to simulate network connection damage during training.
- Evaluated performance on millimeter wave radar human motion and MNIST datasets, comparing SNNs with ANNs at 30% sparsity.
Main Results:
- On the human motion dataset, SNN accuracy dropped by 5.83% vs. 18.71% for ANN at 30% sparsity.
- On the MNIST dataset, SNN accuracy decreased by 3.91% vs. 10.13% for ANN at 30% sparsity.
- SNNs demonstrated significantly better resilience to network damage than ANNs.
Conclusions:
- SNNs possess distinct anti-interference advantages over ANNs under equivalent network damage.
- SNNs offer more stable and superior performance in information processing and pattern recognition.
- Network structure, encoding, and learning algorithms critically influence SNN anti-interference performance.

