Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Expired CO2 Measurement in Intubated or Spontaneously Breathing Patients from the Emergency Department
Published on: January 29, 2011
Comparison of Standardized Mortality Ratios in seven Dutch EDs based on presenting complaints
Wouter Raven1, Bart G J Candel2,3, Nabila Wali2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, RC, 2300, The Netherlands. w.raven@lumc.nl.
Background:
Comparison of emergency departments (EDs) becomes more important, but differences are difficult to interpret because of the heterogeneity of the ED population regarding reason for ED presentation. The aim of this study was two-fold: First to compare patient characteristics (including diagnoses) across 7 EDs. Secondly, to compare Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs) across 7 EDs and in subgroups of ED patients categorized by presenting complaints (PCs).
Methods:
Observational multicenter study including all consecutive visits of 7 Dutch (two tertiary care centre and 5 teaching hospitals) EDs. Patient characteristics, including PCs as part of triage systems, and SMRs (observed divided by expected in-hospital mortality) per ED and for the most common PCs (PC-SMRs) were compared across EDs and presented as funnel plots. The expected mortality was calculated with a prediction model, which was developed using multivariable logistic regression in the overall population and for PCs separately. Demographics, disease severity, diagnoses, proxies for comorbidity and complexity, and PCs (overall population only) were incorporated as covariates.
Results:
We included 693,289 ED visits from January 1, 2017 to June 31, 2023, with a median age of 56 years, of which 47.9% were women and 1.9% died. Patient characteristics varied markedly among EDs. Expected mortality was similar in prediction models with or without diagnoses as covariate. SMRs differed across EDs, ranging from 0.80 to 1.44. All EDs had SMRs within the 95%-Confidence Intervals of the funnel plot apart from one ED, which had an higher than expected SMR. However, PC-SMRs showed more variation and more EDs had SMRs falling outside the funnel, either higher or lower than expected. The ranking of SMRs across EDs was PC-dependent and differences across EDs are present only for specific PC-SMRs, such as in "dyspnea" and "feeling unwell".
Conclusion:
In summary, patient characteristics and mortality varied largely across Dutch EDs, and expected mortality across EDs is well assessed in PC subgroups without adjustment for final diagnoses. Differences in SMRs across EDs are PC-dependent. Future studies should investigate reasons of the differences in PC-SMRs across EDs and whether PC-targeted quality improvement programs can improve outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
04:36Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Relative Risk
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...