Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
Published on: June 23, 2012
High performance imputation of structural and single nucleotide variants using low-coverage whole genome sequencing
Manu Kumar Gundappa1,2, Diego Robledo3, Alastair Hamilton4
1Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. manu.gundappa@wur.nl.
Background:
Whole genome sequencing (WGS), despite its advantages, is yet to replace methods for genotyping single nucleotide variants (SNVs) such as SNP arrays and targeted genotyping assays. Structural variants (SVs) have larger effects on traits than SNVs, but are more challenging to accurately genotype. Using low-coverage WGS with genotype imputation offers a cost-effective strategy to achieve genome-wide variant coverage, but is yet to be tested for SVs.
Methods:
Here, we investigate combined SNV and SV imputation with low-coverage WGS data in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). As the reference panel, we used genotypes for high-confidence SVs and SNVs for n = 365 wild individuals sampled from diverse populations. We also generated 15 × WGS data (n = 20 samples) for a commercial population external to the reference panel, and called SVs and SNVs with gold-standard approaches. An imputation method selected for its established performance using low-coverage sequencing data (GLIMPSE) was tested at WGS depths of 1 × , 2 × , 3 × , and 4 × for samples within and external to the reference panel.
Results:
SNVs were imputed with high accuracy and recall across all WGS depths, including for samples out-with the reference panel. For SVs, we compared imputation based purely on linkage disequilibrium (LD) with SNVs, to that supplemented with SV genotype likelihoods (GLs) from low-coverage WGS. Including SV GLs increased imputation accuracy, but as a trade-off with recall, requiring 3-4 × depth for best performance. Combining strategies allowed us to capture 84% of the reference panel deletions with 87% accuracy at 1 × depth. We also show that SV length affects imputation performance, with provision of SV GLs greatly enhancing accuracy for the longest SVs in the dataset.
Conclusions:
This study highlights the promise of reference panel imputation using low-coverage WGS, including novel opportunities to enhance the resolution of genome-wide association studies by capturing SVs.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

