Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Evaluation of correctness and reliability of GPT, Bard, and Bing chatbots' responses in basic life support scenarios
Saeed Aqavil-Jahromi1, Mohammad Eftekhari2,3, Hamideh Akbari2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. saeedaqavil@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Timely recognition and initiation of basic life support (BLS) before emergency medical services arrive significantly improve survival rates and neurological outcomes. In an era where health information-seeking behaviors have shifted toward online sources, chatbots powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging as potential tools for providing immediate health-related guidance. This study investigates the reliability of AI chatbots, specifically GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and Bing, in responding to BLS scenarios. A cross-sectional study was conducted using six scenarios adapted from the BLS. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) by United Medical Education. These scenarios covering adult, pediatric, and infant emergencies, were presented to each chatbot on two occasions, one week apart. Responses were evaluated by a board-certified emergency medicine professor from Tehran University of Medical Sciences, using a checklist based on BLS-OSCE standards. Correctness was assessed, and reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient. GPT-4 demonstrated the highest correctness in adult scenarios (85% correct responses), while Bard showed 60% correctness. GPT-3.5 and Bing performed poorly across all scenarios. Bard achieved a correctness rate of 52.17% in pediatric scenarios, but all chatbots scored below 44% in infant scenarios. Cohen's kappa indicated substantial reliability for GPT-4 (k = 0.649) and GPT-3.5 (k = 0.645), moderate reliability for Bing (k = 0.503), and fair reliability for Bard (k = 0.357). While GPT-4 showed the highest correctness and reliability in adult BLS situations, all tested chatbots struggled significantly in pediatric and infant cases. Furthermore, none of the chatbots consistently adhered to BLS guidelines, raising concerns about their potential use in real-life emergencies. Based on these findings, AI chatbots in their current form can only be relied upon to guide bystanders through life-saving procedures with human supervision.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...

