Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

90
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
90
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

66
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
66
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

303
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
303

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

External Validation and Clinical Impact of the Barcelona Predictive Models for Detecting Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsies in an Ibero-American Population.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Correction: Combined radiomics, PI-RADS, and clinical model improve significant prostate cancer prediction and guide biopsy decision.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same author

Response to the Letter by Carey and Kommu: 'Generating a consensus on the follow-up of multifocal high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia'.

BJU international·2026
Same author

PSA Response as a Prognostic Factor of Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide: Real-world Evidence.

European urology open science·2026
Same author

Combined radiomics, PI-RADS, and clinical model improve significant prostate cancer prediction and guide biopsy decision.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same author

BJUI compass·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy-Based Treatment Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Resectable Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Study with Meta-Analysis.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K

Developing a Predictive Model for Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Prostatic Biopsies from Seven Clinical

Juan Morote1,2,3, Berta Miró4, Patricia Hernando5

  • 1Department of Urology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.

Cancers
|April 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found both machine learning (ML) and logistic regression (LR) models accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa). ML models excel in sensitivity, while LR models optimize specificity, aiding clinical decisions.

Keywords:
logistic regressionmachine learningpredictive modelsprostate cancer detection

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Prostate Cancer Research

Background:

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis relies on accurate risk stratification.
  • Existing predictive models like the Barcelona (BCN-MRI) model inform clinical decisions.
  • Comparing advanced machine learning (ML) with traditional logistic regression (LR) is crucial for improving PCa detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of ML and LR algorithms in predicting PCa.
  • To evaluate a novel feedforward neural network (FNN)-based SimpleNet model (GMV) against the established BCN-MRI logistic regression (LR) model.
  • To assess predictive accuracy, discrimination, precision-recall, and clinical utility for PCa detection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a cohort of 5005 men suspected of PCa undergoing MRI.
  • Developed and validated a SimpleNet (GMV) ML model and a logistic regression (BCN) model.
  • Evaluated models using area under the curve (AUC), precision-recall metrics, and clinical utility assessments.

Main Results:

  • Both GMV (ML) and BCN (LR) models demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUCs 0.88/0.85 for GMV, 0.85/0.84 for BCN).
  • GMV model showed superior recall (sensitivity), while BCN model offered higher precision and specificity.
  • Both models significantly reduced unnecessary prostate biopsies by approximately 27-29% while maintaining 95% sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning and logistic regression models provide high accuracy for PCa detection.
  • ML models offer enhanced sensitivity (recall), beneficial for ruling out disease.
  • LR models provide higher specificity, useful for reducing unnecessary invasive procedures; model choice depends on clinical priorities.