Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Comparison of Combined Pectoralis Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve Block with Local Infiltration Analgesia in
Muhilan Senthilkumar1, Satyen Parida1, Priya Rudingwa1
1Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Background:
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rates have increased exponentially over the past few decades. Limited options are available for pain-free courses during this procedure. Traditionally, local infiltration with conscious sedation is being used. The pectoral nerves (PECS) block has been evaluated for its analgesic efficacy in breast surgeries. Our study assessed the effectiveness of combined PECS 1 block and intercostal nerve block over local infiltration as an analgesic technique during CIED implantations.
Method:
In this randomized controlled trial, 70 ASA 2 and 3 patients in the age group of 18-75 years scheduled for CIED implantation were randomized into two groups. Group A received local infiltration with 14 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine, and group B received a combined PECS 1 block (10 ml) and intercostal nerve block (4 ml) under ultrasound guidance. Additional lignocaine 1% as 2 ml aliquots was given as rescue during the procedure. We noted the frequency and timing of aliquots. The pain was assessed at 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours post procedure, and intravenous paracetamol was given if the numeric rating scale (NRS) was more than 3. The total paracetamol required and the mean duration of hospital stay were noted for both groups.
Results:
There was a statistically significant decrease in NRS scores at the initial five steps of the procedure in group B except at skin closure, P value = 0.044. The time for the first demand for analgesia was significantly prolonged in group B with 39.6 ± 15.9 vs 19.6 ± 15.1 minutes in the local infiltration group, respectively, with P value = 0.001. Mean fentanyl requirement during the procedure was significantly lower in B (30.4 ± 10.4 mcg vs 50.7 ± 17.7 mcg) when compared to group A, P value < 0.001, and so was the paracetamol requirement in the postprocedure period, P value = 0.003. The postprocedure pain scores and the duration of hospital stay were comparable for both.
Conclusion:
Combined PECS 1 and intercostal nerve block in place of traditional local infiltration significantly reduced NRS score and rescue drug requirement during the procedure. It is a suitable option for these patients.
More Related Videos
07:13Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing
Published on: October 20, 2021
06:48Ethanol-Induced Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion Block Applications for Promoting Canine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Regeneration Using an Artificial Nerve
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers