Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Bringing Rigor to the Use of Evidence in Policy Making: Translating Early Evidence.

Daniel Max Crowley1, J Taylor Scott2

  • 1assistant professor of human development and family studies at Pennsylvania State University and directs the Prevention Economics Planning and Research Program in the Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center. His research focuses on strengthening methods for conducting benefit-cost analyses of preventive interventions, leveraging administrative data to understand the fiscal impact of prevention, and facilitating evidence-based policy making through strategic investments in preventive services.

Public Administration Review
|April 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of research evidence in U.S. state child abuse and neglect policies: 2019-2024.

Child abuse & neglect·2026
Same author

Email outreach attracts the US policymakers' attention to climate change but common advocacy techniques do not improve engagement.

Communications earth & environment·2025
Same author

Preparing public health researchers to interact with state-level legislators: evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration project training.

Journal of public health policy·2025
Same author

The power of lived experience in optimizing US policymakers' engagement with substance use research: A series of rapid-cycle randomized controlled trials.

Drug and alcohol dependence reports·2024
Same author

Findings from the Mighty Girls Efficacy Trial: Changes in Acceptance of Dating Violence.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Integrated Prevention Infrastructure: A Framework for Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Substance Use Policy Making.

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)·2024
Same journal

Collaboration in crisis: Utilizing the SOS program, an at-home COVID-19 vaccine administration initiative, to demonstrate best practices in emergency management collaboration.

Public administration review·2023
Same journal

Liberté, Égalité, Crédibilité: An experimental study of citizens' perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 in eight countries.

Public administration review·2023
Same journal

Inequity after death: Exploring the equitable utilization of FEMA's COVID-19 funeral assistance funds.

Public administration review·2023
Same journal

Crowdsourcing and COVID-19: How Public Administrations Mobilize Crowds to Find Solutions to Problems Posed by the Pandemic.

Public administration review·2022
Same journal

Policy Design for COVID-19: Worldwide Evidence on the Efficacies of Early Mask Mandates and Other Policy Interventions.

Public administration review·2021
Same journal

Getting a Grip on the Performance of Collaborations: Examining Collaborative Performance Regimes and Collaborative Performance Summits.

Public administration review·2021
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
This summary is machine-generated.

Early evidence, including program costs and implementation quality, supplements randomized controlled trials. This approach aids policy making by providing a comprehensive understanding of program impact across diverse groups.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Evidence-Based Policy

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide crucial efficacy data but often lack contextual information.
  • Early evidence on program costs, implementation quality, and subgroup impacts is vital for policy decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a framework for assessing the quality and impact of early evidence.
  • To guide the translation of early evidence into actionable policy recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • The article introduces the Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment (QICEA) framework.
  • It outlines processes for strategic review, evidence quality standards, and policy maker communication.

Main Results:

  • The QICEA framework facilitates the integration of diverse early evidence types.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exemplary efforts demonstrate successful translation of early evidence for policy.

    • Conclusions:

    • A common framework incorporating early evidence enhances policy relevance and decision-making.
    • Integrating cost, quality, and impact data provides a more complete picture beyond RCT efficacy.