Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2025

05:35
Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
678
Infant Reference Intervals-Steps Towards Improving the Supportive Data for Result Interpretation
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Paediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)
|April 19, 2025
Summary
Reference intervals for infants are crucial for interpreting blood tests. Current methods have limitations, but new data from healthy infants offer improved opportunities for accurate pediatric reference ranges.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Laboratory Medicine
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomarker Analysis
Background:
- Accurate interpretation of blood test results requires comparative data, with reference intervals being a key concept.
- Infant biomarker levels change rapidly due to development and growth, necessitating age-specific reference data.
- Conventional methods for establishing reference intervals have limitations, including extensive blood sampling requirements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize the current state of reference intervals, with a specific focus on infant populations.
- To highlight the limitations of existing reference interval methodologies in pediatrics.
- To explore emerging approaches and recent data for establishing infant reference intervals.
Main Methods:
- A literature review of reference percentiles for infants (birth to 12 months) published from 1950 to 2024.
- Searched for terms including pediatric, infant, and neonatal reference intervals.
- Investigated current clinical reference interval data by examining three routine biomarkers on seven Nordic laboratory websites.
Main Results:
- Infant biomarker levels exhibit rapid changes during development and growth.
- New methods using trimmed laboratory data are emerging, but require verification to avoid modeling pathological data.
- Recently published Nordic reference interval data, based on healthy infants at specified time points, show promise.
Conclusions:
- Infant reference interval methodology demands careful consideration due to developmental changes.
- Heterogeneity in current infant reference interval practices necessitates further methodological research.
- Harmonization activities and software development are crucial for improving infant reference interval concepts.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
1.5K
Following these guidelines can help nurses accurately measure vital signs, assess changes in patient conditions, and provide timely treatment when necessary. Adhering closely to the guidelines ensures the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
1.5K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.2K
Midrange
3.5K
A somewhat easy to compute quantitative estimate of a data set’s central tendency is its midrange, which is defined as the mean of the minimum and maximum values of an ordered data set.
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to...
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to...
3.5K

