Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Variant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance
Benjamin J Livesey1, Joseph A Marsh2
1MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Variant effect predictors (VEPs) accurately classify missense variants using deep mutational scanning (DMS) data. This approach aligns with clinical variant classification, aiding genetic diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Computational Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Accurate classification of missense variants relies on understanding protein sequence-function relationships.
- Variant effect predictors (VEPs) are crucial but challenging to evaluate due to data circularity.
- Deep mutational scanning (DMS) offers a robust experimental approach for VEP assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark the performance of 97 VEPs using missense DMS data from 36 human proteins.
- To introduce a VEP-centric pairwise approach to mitigate missing prediction impacts.
- To evaluate the correlation between VEP performance on DMS data and clinical variant classification.
Main Methods:
- Benchmarking 97 VEPs against missense DMS measurements across 36 human proteins.
- Employing a novel pairwise, VEP-centric comparison method.
- Analyzing the concordance between VEP performance in functional assays and clinical variant interpretation.
Main Results:
- A strong correlation was observed between VEP performance on DMS benchmarks and clinical variant classification.
- Predictors not trained on human clinical variants showed notable correspondence.
- The pairwise VEP-centric approach effectively handled missing predictions.
Conclusions:
- Comparing VEPs against diverse functional assays (like DMS) is a reliable strategy for assessing clinical variant classification performance.
- Significant challenges remain in the clinical interpretation of VEP scores, necessitating further research.
- Practical guidance is provided for end-users on selecting appropriate VEP methodologies for genetic diagnosis.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot